0
Why do juvenile court judges have more decression and despistions than adult judges have in sentencing?
Juvenile court judges have more discretion in sentencing because the juvenile justice system is fundamentally focused on rehabilitation rather than punishment. This approach recognizes the developmental differences between children and adults, allowing judges to tailor interventions to individual needs. Additionally, the legal framework governing juvenile cases often provides broader options for handling delinquency, encouraging judges to consider factors like the youth's background and potential for reform. This flexibility aims to promote positive outcomes and reduce recidivism among young offenders.
What else can I help you with?
Will you go to jail for first time offense for statutory burglary?
Unable to answer. Nothing is known of the particulars of the offense or if you are a juvenile or an adult. These things can enter into a judges sentencing decision.
One resson that sentencing guidelines are criticized is?
They are said to limit judges in the use of their own discretion in sentencing.
How many juvenile judges are there?
Unless you narrow down the area you are asking about it is an impossible question to answer to try and calculate the number of juvenile judges.
How is mandatory sentencing useful?
The legislature(s) introduced mandatory sentencing in an effort to make sentencing more equal for the same offenses, and to thwart lenient sentences by 'bleeding heart' judges.
A federal judge must adhere strictly to federal sentencing guidelines?
Federal judges have discretion in sentencing individuals, but they must consider the federal sentencing guidelines as a reference point. While judges are not bound to follow these guidelines, they must provide justification if they deviate significantly from them. Ultimately, judges have the responsibility to ensure that the sentence is fair and proportional to the crime committed.
Are federal judges required to adhere strictly to federal sentencing guidelines?
true .
One reason that sentencing guidelines are criticized is that?
Some judges complain that it takes their discretion to handle the length and type of sentencing away from them. Added: They require incarceration for minor offenses they're too detailed and cumbersome to apply
Which sentencing practice specifies a sentencing range for each criminal offense?
Indeterminate Indeterminate sentencing relies heavily on judges' discretion to choose among types of sanctions and to set upper and lower limits on the length of prison stays.
Who hears minor cases?
Juvenile Court judges.
What structured sentencing models are in use today?
The most common structured sentencing models in use today include determinate sentencing, indeterminate sentencing, and sentencing guidelines. Determinate sentencing involves fixed terms for specific crimes, while indeterminate sentencing allows for a range of time to be served based on individual behavior. Sentencing guidelines provide a framework for judges to consider various factors in determining appropriate sentences.
What are laws that require judges to impose certain sentences in certain situations?
They are referred to a Mandatory Sentencing Laws. The state legislatures of various states have passed certain laws in which the law itself states what the exact penalty will be if the defendant is convicted. Judges have no sentencing discretion in these cases at all.
Over the past 50 years the sentencing options available to judges have increased?
I would agree that the answer is probably yes.
