First of all, I doubt that is true. Secondly, I doubt there is a noticeable difference in car preference on either side of the isle. Thirdly, many "foreign cars" are made in American and many "domestic cars" are made outside of America. And Finally, Obama drives an domestic car and McCain drives a foreign car.
Patriots are ardent supporters of the military. Many actors were ardent supporters of Barrack Obama. Most doctors are ardent supporters of anti-smoking laws.
In recent years - most commonly the North Eastern section of the United States has voted primarily liberal. It is safe to say that Obama's supporters (assuming you're speaking of US politics) are, in part, located in the North East.
Obama would like many things later on like;War in Iraq to end.The Middle and Low classes to be able to pay for food, shelter, clothig, etc.Our Navel Strength to be stronger.Everyone to help build better homes for a better community for a better country.Our stockmarket to rise.Etc., Etc., Etc.There is more at www.brackobama.com.1 I didn't know our middle class couldn't afford food or shelter..... I'm middle class and I'm not starving. Instead of Obama spreading MY wealth, why doesn't he spread my WORK ETHIC!2 - I can't even go on, Obama supporters truly are blind and many are very lazy.We obama supporters are not lazy and blind. we know what is right. And most non-barack obama supporters are racists. Besides, people who dont support obama just care about gossip and apperiences. smarter people care about the better thing like health and money.
His supporters (and most Democrats) would certainly say he is. But this is a very difficult question to answer, since each president has people who agree with their policies, and each president has people who disagree. Both men have aroused a lot of debate and controversy, and both men have been very polarizing figures. At this point, the conversation is very partisan, with President Obama's supporters saying he has had to clean up the mess Bush made, and Bush's supporters saying the former president is being unfairly blamed for everything.
Yes and no. Most campaigns, the president's included, try to find interesting or clever ways to get supporters to donate. One suggestion from the Obama campaign was that if people were getting married, they could donate the dollar value of their wedding presents. It was meant to be clever (opponents thought it was tacky, and even some supporters didn't find it clever at all) but it was not meant to be a requirement; in fact, it is doubtful that most people getting married decided to do it.
It is estimated that 7 percent of Americans drive a Honda car. This makes it one of the most popular foreign cars in the market.
Supporters of Mahan's ideas most likely favored a foreign policy that emphasized the importance of building a strong navy, expanding territorial holdings, and increasing influence through maritime power projection. They would have likely supported policies geared towards securing sea lanes, protecting trade routes, and ensuring naval dominance as a means of achieving national security and economic growth.
It is unclear what this question is asking. The US marks a distinct foreign policy trajectory with every major foreign policy choice, so the choice to bomb Islamic State back in 2014 was the the most recent foreign policy established. If the question is asking what is the most recent "named" foreign policy of the United States, it would be the Obama Doctrine, which crystallized more-or-less in 2011.
Manchester united with 965 million supporters around the globe
Manchester united
Amnat Dithian!!
obama