It enables them to cause large-scale destruction from a relatively safe distance. In relationship to their destructive power, hand grenades are quite small and thus fairly easy for soldiers to carry.
Depends on the women. Women SOLDIERS that have been trained know how to use grenades.
Killing enemy soldiers.
they threw grenades at the sodiers
World War I soldiers used grenades as a means to enhance infantry combat effectiveness, particularly in trench warfare, where close-quarters fighting was common. Grenades allowed soldiers to disable enemy troops and fortifications from a distance, minimizing the risk of direct engagement. Their use helped to break the stalemate of trench warfare by enabling attacks on enemy positions without exposing soldiers to immediate gunfire. Additionally, the development of grenades reflected advancements in weaponry and tactics during the conflict.
yes
With smoke grenades.
Some Allied soldiers carried Thompsons while others had M1 Garands. They also had frag grenades and even flamethrowers.
A rifle. A spade. Hand grenades. Food. Waterproof cape. Helmet. Boots. Medical kit.
7
Saving Private Ryan?
Grenades in World War I offered the advantage of allowing soldiers to attack entrenched enemy positions from a distance, disrupting enemy formations and causing casualties without direct confrontation. They were portable and could be thrown into trenches or over obstacles, increasing tactical flexibility. However, their disadvantages included limited range, the risk of misthrowing or premature detonation, and the fact that soldiers often lacked training in their effective use. Additionally, the reliance on grenades could lead to shortages and logistical challenges in supplying the front lines.
Oh honey, grenades were like the party favor of WWI, causing around 70,000 deaths. It was like a deadly game of hot potato, but instead of a potato, it was an explosive device. Those grenades were no joke, taking out soldiers left and right.