If Congress has enough votes, they do not need the President's approval.
balance of power
He can either sign it to make it a bill, veto it (that is send it back to Congress unsigned ,with his objections ) , or just hold it. If he just holds a bill and Congress stays in session, it becomes law without his signature in 10 days. If Congress adjourns in less than10 days after he gets it, it dies if he does not sign it. Such is called a pocket veto. If he vetoes it, Congress can override his veto with a 2/3 majority vote of both houses.
The president can only send troops out for 60 days without Congress approval, then Congress has to agree and declare war or extend his time.
It is an explanation of issues affecting the nation and the economy. The president is required to deliver this to the Congress every year. Some presidents have even just sent the report to Congress. Today it is a big TV event.
no. If the president just sits on a bill on ten days, it becomes law without his signature. A filibuster is something entirely different- it refers to a tactic in Congress of endless debate in order to prevent a bill from ever coming to a vote.
Just impeachment is not a problem. If a President were impeached and convicted and lost his office, he might also lose his pension. This has never happened. It would be up to Congress. The Presidential pension is set by Congress. It is not something the President pays into out his salary. Congress can do whatever it wants with it.
He did what Obama just did for Libya- ordered military action on his own , without approval from Congress.
I believe congress chooses their salary because the value of money changes over time and so if it was just one set salary made by the constitution it would cause the president to make less.
they could, they just need an electrical impulse.
I am just waiting.... for the right person that cannot live without me.
You cannot evolve without trading, you should just trade with lots of people until you get a gangar
Just Obama