Some people feel that the president should have little to almost no power over things and some people want the president to have a lot of the authority. The people who didn't want the president to have a lot of power were usually afraid that they might turn into dictators.
It is a matter to be debated by the citizens of the country concerned. In many cases presidents can invoke special powers at times of emergency. There are also systems in place to limit presidential power and to reform those powers when needed.
I believe all presidents have used consumer in chief powers because that is what a president is... a commander in chief.
In the 20th century, U.S. presidents increasingly employed military force to expand executive powers, often bypassing Congress. Notable examples include the use of military interventions in Korea and Vietnam, where presidents asserted their authority to act decisively in foreign affairs without formal declarations of war. This trend was further solidified by the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which sought to limit presidential war-making powers but ultimately underscored the executive's ability to engage militarily in conflicts. As a result, presidents have often claimed a broader interpretation of their constitutional powers concerning military action, shaping the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.
The Congress
rape, sex, and anal
The Constitution.
i dunnobarrack obama man
Probably all of them.
the supream court i think
The powers of the Executive Branch are defined in Article XI.
Presidents don't have legislative power. Congress has legislative powers. Presidents don't make laws.
War Powers Act