it was important because dred scott a slave sued the supreme court cause his former owner toook him up north just for teasing dred than when they turned around to go back home his owner died on the way in his will he had to be sent to his widower his wife than dred went to court to sue that "since he was taken in to free states he was now a free african-american" but than the supreme court said "okay that true but your owner had the right to take you anywhere he wanted since he owned him" after that had been said they debated and said only a civilian can sue since they thought low about dred he wasnt even consider a human being just porperty.. after that he was never freed until he died.
An important US Supreme Court case from the 1900's was Lonewolf versus Hitchcock in 1903. Another Supreme Court case was Lisenba versus People of the state of California in 1941. Boynton versus Virginia in 1960 was another Supreme Court case.
The case must be unique and important in order for the Supreme Court to accept the case. The case can also be accepted if it is to resolve a conflict of law.
No it was not a supreme court case, but a state case because it was held in the local court
The case was important because it was the first time the US Supreme Court found a state law unconstitutional. This case was in 1810.
It allowed the Supreme Court to overrule an unconstitutional law.
A case on appeal reaches the supreme court if the judges below them cant handle it or that case specifically but it is very hard to get a case on appeal in the supreme court
You just lost The Game!
chapman won the supreme court case
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
What does the supreme court case burns v. reed do?
Yes, you can appeal to the Supreme Court in this case if you believe there was a legal error in the lower court's decision.
supreme court