The idea of whether a soldier would be justified in refusing the order to fight in World War 2 is a matter of personal opinion. Some believe that when you are called to serve your country in this manner you are obligated to do so. With the amount of deaths and injuries associated with this war others feel that a person should have had the right to make this decision for themselves, especially if they had families they were leaving behind.
Seapower: They relied on the water to fight.
a group of soldiers that stood in a square to fight?
A Patriot would likely argue that soldiers have the right to take what they need from rebels, viewing it as a necessary measure to support their cause and ensure the success of their fight for independence. They might see it as a justified action in the context of war, where resources are vital for survival and victory. Conversely, a loyalist would likely oppose this notion, viewing it as theft or a violation of property rights.
A hole in the ground that soldiers use to fight in is called a Trench.
Cassis clay
49 000 soldiers were sent to fight in the Vietnam war.
they helped because they would fight with the north and that would get them more soldiers.
infantry soldiers
they fight
Yes, Black Soldiers did fight in World War 1
the Chinese invention that allowed soldiers to fight on horseback was The saddle and stirrups.
mohammad ali clay