Never good, but sometimes unavoidable - as when Britain had to react to Hitler's flouting of international treaties.
The event that conflicted them is that the Jamestown settlers took the Powhatan leader and killed him. So this made them gom in wars.
german and scottish farmers
decreased wars among Indian tribes.
The Quasi-War was an undeclared war fought almost entirely at sea between the United States and France from 1798 to 1800. In the United States, the conflict was sometimes referred to as the Franco-American War, the Undeclared War with France, the Pirate Wars, or the Half-War.
here are a list of civil wars: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_civil_wars and here's a list of wars of independence: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_of_Independence For countries that had both a war of independence and a civil war I would say that America and Ireland would be most notable. Along with many south and central American countries including Mexico, Cuba and Guatemala.
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives. Wars are not the solution of any conflict. Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. Wars bring down the economic conditions of the country as well. Throughout the history, no war has ever ended a conflict. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals. Gandhi won a war without even fighting one.
No, wars are not a good way to end conflict between two countries or individual. Wars bring destruction and nothing else. It results in the loss of resources as well as lives. Wars are not the solution of any conflict. Mutual understanding and conversation are the basis of better results for any conflict. Wars bring down the economic conditions of the country as well. Throughout the history, no war has ever ended a conflict. One war has either led to another war or cold war or war-like circumstances. So wars are not at all a good way to end conflicts between countries or individuals. Gandhi won a war without even fighting one.
Wars are definitely not a good way to end conflict. Because, in wars many innocent people die. Also, so-many resources are wasted.
They would not be my first choice, however, there are times when war is an appropriate means of resolving a conflict. Remember that wars are expensive, they get people killed and countries destroyed. If there is another way of resolving the conflict, that should be considered first.
If there were no countries, there would be no border disputes and no wars between countries. Countries are the source of a tremendous amount of conflict, as are religions. John Lennon wanted to imagine a more peaceful world.
The Wars Of The Roses
The Peloponnesion Wars
wars are not a good way to resolve conflicts because children are orphaned , women are widowed . It dries up the kindness in peoples heart and turns them into worthless brutes . it is doom and destruction for those who wage it and for those who survive it. hence universal brotherhood must be encouraged amongst the people
War is an extension of the political process and often leads to peaceful negotiations .
There are no wars between any countries that are in the EU, meaning there is no military conflicts. The only kinds of conflict that there is are simple disagreements between politicians of different countries. One of the reasons for setting up what is now the European Union was to enable countries that had fought each other during World War I and World War II to work together for mutual benefit. That has been largely successful.
Cause of WarsReligion (the conflict between Catholics and Protestants) was the cause of these wars. (link)
Cause of WarsReligion (the conflict between Catholics and Protestants) was the cause of these wars. (link)