LOL i got the same exact answer in my AP US History class? The Same exact wording
In the middle colonies, the experience of slaves was generally less harsh compared to the southern colonies, where the plantation system dominated. Middle colonies often had a more diverse economy with smaller farms, allowing for a somewhat less oppressive environment, and some slaves could earn wages or gain limited autonomy. In contrast, southern colonies relied heavily on slave labor for large-scale agriculture, leading to brutal conditions and a more rigid racial hierarchy. Additionally, the social dynamics in the southern colonies reinforced a more entrenched system of slavery compared to the relatively more integrated society of the middle colonies.
Political representation differed in the colonies when compared to England. The colonists did not have any representation. The English citizens did.
remained tiny compared with the number in England
The Spanish empire in the New World was much larger.
In some colonies in the Americas, certain enslaved individuals experienced relatively better treatment compared to others, often due to factors like the size of the plantation, the specific owner’s practices, and the economic circumstances. Enslaved people might have had access to better living conditions, food, and even opportunities for skilled work, which could lead to slightly improved status. Some owners were known to foster a more paternalistic approach, providing care in exchange for loyalty and labor. However, it's crucial to note that this did not change the fundamentally oppressive nature of slavery, and experiences varied widely.
The colonies owned by European powers produced cotton, materials for textiles, vegetables, clothing, tobacco and gold and silver. Their colonies were often in tropical or semi tropical climates and thus offered a variety of "planting" seasons. Also, the soil in the colonies were relatively fresh compared to the crop fields in Europe.
"Relatively" means "as compared to other things". The antonym would therefore be "Absolutely".
In the middle colonies, the experience of slaves was generally less harsh compared to the southern colonies, where the plantation system dominated. Middle colonies often had a more diverse economy with smaller farms, allowing for a somewhat less oppressive environment, and some slaves could earn wages or gain limited autonomy. In contrast, southern colonies relied heavily on slave labor for large-scale agriculture, leading to brutal conditions and a more rigid racial hierarchy. Additionally, the social dynamics in the southern colonies reinforced a more entrenched system of slavery compared to the relatively more integrated society of the middle colonies.
The majority of indentured servants were in the northern colonies, such as New York and Pennsylvania, while the southern colonies, like Virginia and South Carolina, had more slaves due to their reliance on plantation agriculture. Of these, Virginia had the most indentured servants, while South Carolina had relatively fewer slaves compared to other southern colonies.
11 is a prime number. For it to be relatively prime, it needs to be compared to another integer.
Nine can only be relatively prime when compared to another number or set of numbers. 9 is relatively prime to 4, 9 is not relatively prime to 12.
Relatively prime numbers are two or more numbers that can be compared with each other. A single number cannot be relatively prime.
Lobengula compares the British to a hungry chameleon
The Southern colonies were more aristocratic.
the southern colonies were more aristocratic
because of the cllimate by: Sarah saad
False