enjoyed longer lives and more stable families. -zack get attt me nukkkaa ;))
new England was a place for the puritans separatists. chesapeake region was just for the colonists to strike gold and get rich. new England was against slavery and the Chesapeake region wasfor slavery. new England didn't invest in cash crops. new England was mostly English and whites while Chesapeake was mostly slaves. new England formed the congregrational church whereas Chesapeake formed the Anglican church. new England was rich in fur, timber and fish. Chesapeake was good with farming [tobacco] fishing and shipbuilding. the new englanders were family oriented and one farm was Enough to feed one family.hi
He made sure colonists didn't pass any laws that could hurt England A+
Most colonists wanted the same rights and privileges enjoyed by British citizens living in England.
Political representation differed in the colonies when compared to England. The colonists did not have any representation. The English citizens did.
d
colonial boycotts hated the colonists and England traded
Imperial legislation in England during the late 1600s, such as the Navigation Acts, had a significant impact on the Chesapeake colonies. These acts were designed to regulate trade and bolster England's mercantile system, leading to increased enforcement and restrictions on colonial trade. This ultimately limited the economic autonomy of the Chesapeake colonies and contributed to tensions between the colonists and the English crown.
Most of them came from England.
chesapeake,middle,southern,and new England
enjoyed longer lives and more stable families. -zack get attt me nukkkaa ;))
There are various reason for such a contrasting life expectancy, the following are just a few quick pointers for you to consider. - Far less women travelled to Chesapeake which caused an unbalance in marriage and family- raising. - Indian diplomacy was non- existent in Chesapeake, John Smith's story accounts for war and rivalry against local tribes, namely Pohatan's tribe. - Fresh water, clean air and even hygiene was at a much lower standard in Chesapeake than it was in New England. - Farming and fishing was prosperous in New England and generally failed in Chesapeake and accounted for the lack of provisions. Colonists were not from a agriculture background in Chesapeake, mainly jewellers, bankers and accountants who had no knowledge of survival in the new world. - Trade was almost zero in Chesapeake as they did not find a resource to trade to achieve commerce.
No, the first colonists were fleeing religious persecution in England.
Virginia is a huge tract of land north of the Chesapeake Bay. It was claimed by England during colonial times and was eventually made a huge producer of cotton and tobacco and indigo.
Colonial Virginia was under the control of England and the early Virginian colonists, by law, had to pay taxes to support the Anglican Church (Church of England.) Most of the early colonists in Virginia were part of the Anglican Church, however there were some other Protestant denominations that were present.
Men and women's roles in America were almost the same as their roles in England, but the colonies were very isolated from England. In America, the colonists had to worry about Indian attacks, and slavery. There were poor families in England,but no slaves. Men outnumbered women in the American colonies,and the mortality rates were much higher in America than England.
new England was a place for the puritans separatists. chesapeake region was just for the colonists to strike gold and get rich. new England was against slavery and the Chesapeake region wasfor slavery. new England didn't invest in cash crops. new England was mostly English and whites while Chesapeake was mostly slaves. new England formed the congregrational church whereas Chesapeake formed the Anglican church. new England was rich in fur, timber and fish. Chesapeake was good with farming [tobacco] fishing and shipbuilding. the new englanders were family oriented and one farm was Enough to feed one family.hi