answersLogoWhite

0

George and Hazel are portrayed as being somewhat naive, and as being taken advantage of by the government. 'Harrison Bergeron' is a short story written by Kurt Vonnegut.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

How are george and hazel related to harrison bergeron?

George and Hazel Bergeron are Harrison Bergeron's parents in Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron." They live in a dystopian society that enforces strict equality through physical and mental handicaps. George is burdened with a mental handicap to prevent him from using his intelligence, while Hazel has a less demanding role due to her average intelligence. Their relationship highlights the themes of conformity and the consequences of enforced equality in the narrative.


How did hazel and george react to their son escaping?

what do you consider to be the message of harrison bergeron what leads you to this unberstandingof the text


Why wasn't the bulletin clear at first to George and Hazel and other viewers in Harrison Bergeron?

Because they're stupid.


Why does the government handicap George but not Hazel in Harrison Bergeron?

George's intelligence was more than the average person, so the government made him wear a handicap. Hazel's intelligence was just average so she did not need a handicap.


What is an idiom in Harrison Bergeron?

An idiom in "Harrison Bergeron" could be "to tip one's hand," which means to inadvertently reveal one's intentions or strategy. This idiom is used when George Bergeron talks about Hazel not wanting to think about anything except television programs, in order to avoid possible conflict or trouble.


How are George and Hazel related to Harrison by Kurt Vonnegut?

George and Hazel are Harrison's parents in Kurt Vonnegut's short story "Harrison Bergeron." They are average individuals who live in a society where everyone is forced to be equal in every way. Harrison, their son, becomes a symbol of defiance against this enforced equality.


How are George and Hazel characterized by Kurt Vonnegut?

George and Hazel in Kurt Vonnegut's story "Harrison Bergeron" are characterized as average and unremarkable individuals who epitomize the complete conformity and lack of critical thinking in their society. They both embody the extreme mediocrity and lack of individuality that is enforced by the government in their dystopian world.


At the opening of the story what has happened to the son of George and Hazel Bergeron?

At the opening of the story "Harrison Bergeron" by Kurt Vonnegut, George and Hazel's son, Harrison, has been taken away by the government because he is exceptionally gifted and poses a threat to the enforced equality of society. He has been imprisoned for his extraordinary abilities, which include strength and intelligence far above average. The couple is deeply affected by his absence, yet they are also conditioned to accept the government's oppressive measures.


What is the birth name of Hazel George?

Hazel George's birth name is Hazel Inez Gilman.


Read the passage from Harrison Bergeron by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. It was tragic all right but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence which meant she?

The inability to concentrate on difficult things; the government's insistence that no one has an advantage over another


which excerpt most clearly suggests that George and Hazel are living in a dystopian society in the story “Harrison Bergeron”?

All this equality was due to the 211th, 212th, and 213th Amendments to the Constitution, and to the unceasing vigilance of the .... Handicapper General.


How do George and hazel react to the televised murder of their son in Harrison Bergeron?

In Kurt Vonnegut's "Harrison Bergeron," George and Hazel's reactions to the televised murder of their son are characterized by a profound sense of emotional numbness and helplessness. George, unable to think deeply due to his mental handicap, quickly forgets the event, while Hazel, who has average intelligence, expresses a fleeting moment of sadness but does not fully comprehend the gravity of the situation. Their reactions highlight the oppressive nature of the society they live in, which suppresses individuality and emotion to maintain enforced equality. Ultimately, their inability to process their grief underscores the tragic consequences of a system that prioritizes sameness over genuine human connection.