I dont know,tell me
Could the colonies labor problem have been solved without slavery?
i have the same problem i cant figure it out
It was difficult to unite the 13 American colonies after the American Revolutionary War. These colonies had previously been under the rule of the British Empire, they were dominated by people with British backgrounds and were living under a Monarchy and a powerful parliament controlled by the wealthy men of England, Their task was to not have a monarch or have a government anyway like that of Great Britain.Thus, the field was wide open in the goal of establishing something new. The colonies were different in their economies. The Southern ones were based on agriculture while Northern colonies were affected greatly by the industrial revolution they had absorbed from industrial England. Another factor dividing the founding fathers was their views on slavery which had been ingrained in the South for more than 100 years. The eventual decision to create a nation with a real "central" government as opposed to the one under the previous Articles of Confederation, presented a problem. Many wanted the new "federal" government to be as less powerful as possible. Others saw the need for a strong central government. Each of them had strong loyalties to their home colonies, and these colonies were almost independent of the others. They feared losing individual rights under a central government that was too strong and could hamper the rights the fathers were used to. All these factors made uniting the colonies into a viable State among the nations of the world very difficult.
What the colonist wanted was representation in parliament and if that had happened there may not have been a revolution, but parliament wasn't the problem it was the king. Many in parliament agreed with the colonies positions and wore a powder blue ribbon or clothing to show support.
New Jersey In the 1660's England had a lot of colonies in America. But King Charles II wanted another one. He gave the New Netherlands to his brother James, the Duke of York. But there was one problem, the Dutch owned the New Netherlands. In May of 1664, he sent warships to the New Netherlands. The Dutch people surrendered without a fight. In 1664 James gave part of New York to two friends, Sir George Carteret and John Berkeley. So James named the new colony New Jersey. They were the proprietors. They charged the settlers who moved onto their land. To get colonists to move to New Jersey the proprietors offered cheap land and freedom of religion. Many settlers came to New Jersey. In 1672 the Dutch reclaimed New Jersey and the English couldn't get it back till 1674. In 1674 John Berkeley sold his part of New Jersey to two Quakers. The Quakers were a religious group that was a part of England, and many Quakers wanted to move to America. New Jersey was divided into East Jersey and West Jersey. The Quakers moved into West Jersey. Then Sir Carteret's widow sold West Jersey to twenty-four English, Irish, and Scottish men. Most of them were Quakers. Neither East nor West Jersey was very successful. In 1702 they joined together and made a royal colony ruled by the king of England.
I dont know,tell me
Faraway objects are blurry
Could the colonies labor problem have been solved without slavery?
Have a word with his governing body and explain your problem to them.
im pretty sure LAW is #1 problem.
they dont work
I Dont Know
i think you have cancer you should get it checked out
The high price and scarcity of goods.
The main problem are less food, less work, and hard time with share food with many colonies.
that the northern colonies are proven tough to tame
i have the same problem i cant figure it out