0
What else can I help you with?
Who was dred Scott and what was the dred Scott decision?
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
Why was Dred Scott decision a victory for slave owners?
It declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union according to the Constitution.
The decision in the Dred Scott case was that .?
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
How did the South feel about Dred Scott?
They embraced the decision. It verified their view of a slave society.
What did the Dred Scott Decision did Not do?
First of all learn how to talk. Then go ask Your History teacher this question. you should have said "What did the Dred Scott decision do?" It was a slave who thought he was free and they went to court over it and the court said he was a slave and that he was not free.
Who was dred Scott and what was the dred Scott decision?
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
What caused Southern slave owners to be happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?
Southern slave owners were happy with the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision because it allowed them to take their slaves into slave free territories and not give up ownership. The case undermined local sovereignty.
Why was Dred Scott decision a victory for slave owners?
It declared that slavery was legal in every state of the Union according to the Constitution.
Why were many southerners pleased by the courts decision in the dread Scott case?
Many Southerners were pleased by the Dred Scott case decision because it upheld the rights of slave owners by ruling that slaves were property and not citizens, which meant they could be taken into any territory in the United States. This decision supported the expansion of slavery and protected the economic interests of slave owners in the South.
What did the south think about the dred Scott decision?
The South supported the Dred Scott decision, as it reinforced the rights of slave owners to take their slaves into territories where slavery was prohibited. They viewed it as a victory for protecting their property rights and upholding the institution of slavery.
What was decision in the dred Scott case was that?
Scott was a slave and could not win suit.
The decision in the Dred Scott case was that .?
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
What decision in the dred Scott case was that .?
Scott was a slave and could not win suit.
Who outlawed the slave trade in Washington DC and included the Fugitive Slave Act that required all runaway slaves to be returned to their owners?
Congress passed the Fugitive Slave Law and the Supreme Court upheld it in the Dred Scott Decision.
What was dred scott case about?
Dred Scott sued his owners for freedom when they took him to the Northern states. The Supreme Court ruled that he did not have the right to sue whether he was a slave or free. That decision was overturned nine years later.
Did living in a free state mean a slave was free?
No. The Dred Scott decision basically said all the states of the USA were slave states and a slave in a "free" state was still a slave. The Dred Scott decision helped to lead to the Civil War.
How was the dred Scott decision good?
The direct answer to the question is that the Dred Scott decision was good for slave owners. In a larger sense it was not good at all. The decision by the US Supreme Court was more important to the United States than it was to slave holder Dred Scott. This was so because in an 1857 Supreme Court decision, slaves in the United States, whether in bondage or freed men & women, could never be US citizens. This decision was a setback for the antislavery abolitionists and a victory of sorts for slave owners. Taken in its totality it was a setback for the United States as a whole. The above answer is correct, however, if there was "good" in the Dredd Scott decision it was that the US Supreme Court made it clear what its position on slavery was. Thereby giving opponents of slavery ground to stand on in their efforts to limit or abolish slavery.
