0
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
What else can I help you with?
How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did Southern slaveholders attempt to convince people in the North to support slavery?
The Southerners pointed out that northern industry relied on southern cotton. Southern slaveholders argued that slavery benefited both the South and the North because the North's textile and shipping industries depended upon cotton from the South.
How did southern slaveholders claim the north benefited from slavery?
They pointed out that the North's textile industry depended on southern cotton Well, they didn't really. Northern states didn't really have slavery much at all. Though they did want more political and military power than the south, so they started the civil war. The civil war actually really wasn't just all about freeing the slaves. Actually, freeing the slaves may have been the last thing on their minds.
Why did many Americans oppose abolishing slavery?
Because it benefited the North, They feared that the blacks would take their jobs, and also worried that the end of slavery would cut off the supply of southern cotton for northern textile mills.
Who benefited more from the compromise 1850 North or South?
The Compromise of 1850 primarily benefited the South, as it included the controversial Fugitive Slave Act, which strengthened the enforcement of returning escaped slaves and allowed for the expansion of slavery into new territories. Although the North gained California as a free state, the overall concessions made to the South, particularly regarding slavery's expansion, reflected a greater advantage for Southern interests at that time. The compromise temporarily eased tensions between the North and South but ultimately failed to resolve the underlying issues surrounding slavery.
How did Southerners slaveholders claim that the north benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did southerners claim that the North benefited from slavery?
they pointed out that the north's textile industry depended on southern cotton.
How did Southern slaveholders attempt to convince people in the North to support slavery?
The Southerners pointed out that northern industry relied on southern cotton. Southern slaveholders argued that slavery benefited both the South and the North because the North's textile and shipping industries depended upon cotton from the South.
How did southern slaveholders claim the north benefited from slavery?
They pointed out that the North's textile industry depended on southern cotton Well, they didn't really. Northern states didn't really have slavery much at all. Though they did want more political and military power than the south, so they started the civil war. The civil war actually really wasn't just all about freeing the slaves. Actually, freeing the slaves may have been the last thing on their minds.
What are pros and cons of arguing?
Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.
What are the cons of the Missouri compromise?
Good question! The North benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another state in the North (Maine) that did not allow slavery (because the North didn't like slavery.) The South benefited from the Missouri Compromise, because they received another southern state (Missouri) that was capable of having slaves. This way, both the North and the South had an equal amount of 12 Northern states and 12 Southern states.
Was the North for or against slavery?
against slavery and the south was for slavery!! <3
Did Hugh Williamson have anything to do with slavery?
Hugh Williamson was a signer of the United States Constitution and a prominent North Carolina delegate to the Constitutional Convention in 1787. There is no direct evidence to suggest that he was involved in slavery. However, as a plantation owner in North Carolina, it is likely that he may have benefited from the institution of slavery in his personal life.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of The Missouri Compromise?
An advantage to the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was that slavery would not be permitted in the territory that is now the state of Missouri. A disadvantage to the Missouri Compromise was that people who believed in slavery in the South could not move north to gain more land and keep their slaves.
Why did many Americans oppose abolishing slavery?
Because it benefited the North, They feared that the blacks would take their jobs, and also worried that the end of slavery would cut off the supply of southern cotton for northern textile mills.
What were the consequences of the Fugitive Slave Act for slaveholders white northerners free African Americans and fugitive slaves?
The Fugitive Slave Act required Northerners to assist in capturing and returning escaped slaves, leading to increased tensions between slaveholders and abolitionists in the North. Free African Americans were at risk of being mistakenly captured and returned to slavery, while fugitive slaves faced even greater danger and uncertainty in seeking freedom. White slaveholders, on the other hand, had more legal power to retrieve their escaped property, strengthening the institution of slavery.
Did the north want slavery?
No. North wanted to end slavery and south wanted slavery
