well i have a question regarding the Darwinists i would like to now how they justify expansionism? thank you
the united states had been formed by a voluntary joining of states
After the United States Civil War, railroads penetrated the vast majority of the country's regions and companies.
They said the original United States had been formed voluntarily, and that the member-states were free to quit the Union if they wanted.
expansionists used the term "manifest destiny" to justify what belief?
Westward expansion gave the United States its character of rugged independence. The expansion had shaped the nation's values
the united states had been formed by a voluntary joining of states
Expansion was needed to keep the United States safe from its enemies.
During the westward expansion of the United States, the death rate on the Oregon Trail was estimated to be around 10.
it was the northwest ordinace
The Manifest Destiny of the United States to be a continent-wide power (Manifest Destiny for short) was the idea that was used to justify and at times to drive the expansion of the United States during the 19th Century. This was the idea that it was obvious to all (manifest) that it was the destiny of the US to encompass whatever territory was at issue at the moment.
People used exceptionalism to justify expansion by promoting the idea that their nation or culture was inherently superior and had a divine right to spread its values and systems. This belief often manifested in the notion of Manifest Destiny in the United States, where expansion was seen as a moral obligation to bring civilization and progress to perceived "lesser" societies. Such ideologies helped rationalize colonialism and imperialism, framing expansion as a benevolent mission rather than an exercise of power. Ultimately, exceptionalism provided a moral veneer for the exploitation and domination of other peoples and territories.
It became property of the United States.
recession
Manifest Destiny
a recession
The Anti-Imperialist League was concerned about the negative impact of the United States' expansion of imperialist policies on the sovereignty and rights of other nations.
The United States should own the land between the Atlantic and the Pacific.