The Southern economy was predominantly agrarian, relying heavily on cash crops like cotton and tobacco, which required a large labor force for cultivation and harvesting. This created a dependence on slavery, as enslaved people provided a cost-effective and readily available workforce. In contrast, the Northern economy was more industrialized and diversified, focusing on manufacturing and commerce, which did not necessitate the same reliance on slave labor. The economic structures thus reinforced differing social and labor systems, perpetuating the South's dependence on slavery.
It was not as accepted in the north, and was not as important in the economy, as for the south, without slavery there economy would fail.
the northern economy ended slavery.the southern economy continued slavery
the north had little or no need for slavery because of there geography. agriculture did not revolve around slavery. this not saying that slaves could not be used but in this society they are not as excepted in the north as in the south. without slavery, the south's economy would be drastically different. the north already had ajusted to no slavery. people like to stay with status quo.
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.
Northern states had a completely different attitude towards slavery and race equality. Abolition campaign was very strong in the north and had the support of political and religious leaders. North had become an industrialized and urbanized region with little dependence on agriculture, where slaves were largely utilized. Slavery was viewed negatively in north and by 1840 almost the entire African American populace in north was free. In a total contrast, southern states' economy depended on plantation agriculture where slavery was a vital part of society. The attitude of southerners was pro slavery and after the election victory of Abraham Lincoln, slave states decided to secede from the union as they feared a end of slavery under pro-abolition Lincoln.
Generally speaking, the slavery in the South and its agrarian economy led to its downfall. The North had good farmland and did not depend on slave labor.
It was not as accepted in the north, and was not as important in the economy, as for the south, without slavery there economy would fail.
the northern economy ended slavery.the southern economy continued slavery
How slavery would affect the economy
slavery was not critical to the sucess of the economy in the north
because he wanted to abolish slavery and the souths economy depended on slavery for field work while the north had factories to fuel their economy
a necessary evil
Slavery was not economical in the north. Due to more extreme winters, the agricultural seasons were shortened, and the north was not so dependent on crops as income. Slavery was not as embedded as a major part of the economy.
the role it played in the economy
The north had an economy based on Manufacturing this made northerners oppose slavery because slaves could have taken their jobs
the north had little or no need for slavery because of there geography. agriculture did not revolve around slavery. this not saying that slaves could not be used but in this society they are not as excepted in the north as in the south. without slavery, the south's economy would be drastically different. the north already had ajusted to no slavery. people like to stay with status quo.
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.