0
What else can I help you with?
What were two events that fueled the debate over slavery between 1846 and 1850?
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
What are some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery?
Some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery include humanitarian results. For example, when people treat others fairly, all will be educated and respected and slavery will stop growing.
What battle over extending slavery finally results in two states and an agreement on how to handle slavery in the territories?
Not battle, but a debate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820.
How did California's propose admission to the union affect the debate between the north and the south over slavery?
California's proposed admission to the Union in 1850 intensified the sectional conflict between the North and South over slavery. As a free state, its admission threatened to upset the balance of power in Congress, which had been maintained between free and slave states. This led to fierce debates, culminating in the Compromise of 1850, which sought to address the issue by admitting California as a free state while allowing new territories to decide on slavery through popular sovereignty. Ultimately, this compromise temporarily eased tensions but highlighted the deepening divide over slavery in America.
What ended the debate of slavery?
The debate over slavery in the United States was effectively ended by the Civil War (1861-1865) and the subsequent passage of the Thirteenth Amendment in 1865, which abolished slavery. The war highlighted the deep divisions between the North and South, with the Northern states opposing slavery and the Southern states supporting it. The Union victory and the amendment marked a definitive legal and constitutional rejection of slavery, although the social and economic consequences of this change continued to evolve in the following decades.
How did the question of the admission of new states to the union fuel the debate over slavery and states rights?
dildo
How did the question of admission of new states to the union fuel the debate over slavery and states rights?
dildo
What were two events that fueled the debate over slavery between 1846 and 1850?
The admission of new states to the union and Dred Scott decision fueled the ongoing debate over slavery. (I got this off of ChaCha.com)
How did the question of whether to admit new states to the Union fuel the debate over slavery and state rights?
The slavery debate was mostly to do with the new states - whether they would be slave or free, the proportion of slave-states in Congress, and their influence on the voting.
How did the question of admission of new states to the union fuel the debate over states right?
I.do not now lalalala ok so better keep it learning those study
What positions did Lincoln and Douglas take in their debates?
Both had a strong position in the Anti Slavery debate. They both were against slavery and agreed that there should be no more slave states.
The Compromise of 1850 was only a small aspect of the debate over slavery TRUE OR FALSE?
FALSE. The Compromise of 1850 was a significant and influential aspect of the broader debate over slavery in the United States. It aimed to address the contentious issues arising from the expansion of slavery into newly acquired territories after the Mexican-American War. The compromise included measures such as the admission of California as a free state and the implementation of a stricter Fugitive Slave Act, highlighting the deep divisions in the nation over the issue of slavery.
How did the sectionalism contribute to the ongoing debate about the admission of the states?
Sectionalism, the strong allegiance to regional interests over national unity, significantly influenced the debate over state admissions in the U.S. during the 19th century. As new states sought admission to the Union, tensions arose between free states and slave states regarding whether these states would permit slavery, impacting the balance of power in Congress. This division heightened regional conflicts, as each side aimed to expand its influence, ultimately contributing to the polarization that led to the Civil War. The debates over admission reflected deeper societal rifts that underscored the nation's struggles with issues of identity and governance.
What are some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery?
Some possible results of the growing sectional debate over slavery include humanitarian results. For example, when people treat others fairly, all will be educated and respected and slavery will stop growing.
Why did southern states secede from from the US of America?
because they didnt want him to make slavery illegal !
What battle over extending slavery finally results in two states and an agreement on how to handle slavery in the territories?
Not battle, but a debate. The Missouri Compromise of 1820.
How did California's propose admission to the union affect the debate between the north and the south over slavery?
California's proposed admission to the Union in 1850 intensified the sectional conflict between the North and South over slavery. As a free state, its admission threatened to upset the balance of power in Congress, which had been maintained between free and slave states. This led to fierce debates, culminating in the Compromise of 1850, which sought to address the issue by admitting California as a free state while allowing new territories to decide on slavery through popular sovereignty. Ultimately, this compromise temporarily eased tensions but highlighted the deepening divide over slavery in America.
