The war less damaging to the economy of the North than to that of the South because most of the war and battles occurred in the South resulting in loss of farms, crops, and any industry near any battle site.
The north had very little knowledge of the south's land. The south had an extremely poor economy.
North wanted new states NOT to be slave and the South did. Also the North economy was more industrialized and the South economy was more agricultural and relied on slave labor
Slavery was more important to the South than it was to the North, because the South's economy relied on agriculture.
Badly. Differently. Significantly.
The Civil War greatly improved the economy of the North but harmed the economy of the South.
The North, with its factories and large cities, had less use for slave labor. Economic differences between the North and South, and the South's insistence on maintaining slavery, eventually led to war.~Emily
The south's greatest weakness was its economy, the north barricaded them on the seaboard, so the south had no money from their cotton industry. They also had no food for their soldiers because the food factories were in the north.
yes the south agriculture the north industrial
By destorying homes and factories in the south
it made the south lose the war
The South Lost the war, and the economy of the South was built on Slavery which came to an end as a result of the war.
The war less damaging to the economy of the North than to that of the South because most of the war and battles occurred in the South resulting in loss of farms, crops, and any industry near any battle site.
I farted
it wasn't as badly affected as the south.
It was a mess. The south's economy was suffering greatly. It was hard on the South that the war was in their territory and that the North was doing everything it could and using its strong economy and strong followers to win the war.
The north had very little knowledge of the south's land. The south had an extremely poor economy.