answersLogoWhite

0

President Jackson said that it would be in the Native American's best interest to be far away from white Americans.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What were Georgias policies toward Native Americans?

Thinking the Native Americans would revolt, Georgia made forceful policies.


What were the effects of the US government policies toward Native Americans in the mid 1800's?

food


What statement is accurate about the behavior of the conquistadors toward the Native Americans?

They sought gold and enslaved Native Americans.


Favoritism toward native-born Americans?

nativism


WHAT WAS the goal of the Federal Government's policy toward Native Americans in 1800?

The Northwest Ordinance of 1787 stated the original policy of the U.S. federal government toward the Native Americans.


What were thomas jacksons policies towards native Americans?

Thomas Jackson, also known as Stonewall Jackson, is not known to have had a policy toward Native Americans. Andrew Jackson, a generation earlier, and no relation to Stonewall, carried out a policy similar to a Russian progrom to force Native Americans across the Mississippi to a separate territory. This became known as the Trail of Tears.


What is Jefferson and attitude toward native Americans in the letter?

POsitive


Why you're Jackson's policies toward native Americans controversial?

Andrew Jackson's policies toward Native Americans, particularly the Indian Removal Act of 1830, are controversial because they led to the forced displacement of thousands of Indigenous people from their ancestral lands, most notably resulting in the Trail of Tears. These actions were justified by Jackson as necessary for American expansion and economic growth, but they disregarded the sovereignty and rights of Native American tribes. Critics argue that his policies were rooted in racism and a blatant disregard for human rights, leading to significant suffering and loss of life among Indigenous populations. This legacy continues to evoke strong reactions and discussions about justice and reparations for Native Americans today.


What was one result of Andrew jacksons policies toward native Americans?

One significant result of Andrew Jackson's policies toward Native Americans was the forced removal of thousands of Indigenous people from their ancestral lands, most notably exemplified by the Trail of Tears. This policy, enacted through the Indian Removal Act of 1830, led to the suffering and death of many Native Americans during their relocation to designated Indian Territory. The loss of their lands and resources resulted in profound cultural and social disruption for various tribes across the southeastern United States.


How did colonists attitudes toward native Americans?

Colonists' attitudes toward Native Americans varied significantly, often influenced by economic interests and cultural misconceptions. Many colonists viewed Native Americans as obstacles to land expansion and resources, leading to conflict and dispossession. However, some colonists recognized the complexity of Native American societies and engaged in trade and diplomacy. Overall, attitudes ranged from hostility and exploitation to curiosity and respect, shaped by individual experiences and the broader context of colonial policies.


The sand creek of 1864 and the Battle at wounded Knee in 1890 are examples of what U.S. policy toward Native Americans?

Allotment and Assimilation policies. Or, make them follow white American culture


How did the new president differ from Sam Houston in his policy toward native Americans?

The new president, Mirabeau B. Lamar, differed significantly from Sam Houston in his policy toward Native Americans. While Houston favored negotiation and coexistence, Lamar adopted a more aggressive approach, advocating for the removal of Native Americans from Texas lands. He believed in expansion and viewed Native Americans as obstacles to progress, leading to military campaigns against them and policies that sought to drive them out of the region entirely. This marked a stark shift in the treatment and perception of Native American tribes during their respective administrations.