Very interesting, and very telling about how cultural differences are good indicators of serious dysfunctions.
I'm no expert in the area, but i have the impression that among "typical Native Americans", and Tribal Africans, the land was held in common, and viewed as "owned by the tribe". These people were wise enough to realize that the land really belonged to "God", and Nature, and that they were a part of Nature itself, not outside of it, and CERTAINLY not above it.
Europeans, somewhere along the line came to believe that they were in charge of the natural world and could own portions, privately. This stupidity and arrogance has led to where we are today -- a planet owned and run by murderous psychopaths, who think only of themselves, and their dysfunctional ego needs. Totally psychotic and pathetic. They are killing the planet and, literally, have plans to murder a vast portion of the "peasant population" so that the planet will be more comfortable for them. Those who survive the mass genocide will be their slaves. This answer is drakke1 s not myne ;
helped to restore some reservation lands to tribal ownership.
The doctrine made the Indians the "right occupant" while giving legal ownership to the European governments.
c. Western Native Americans were not used to settled agriculture life
all of the above - APEX
Land and religion were two things that the Native Americans and European settlers fought over. The two groups had differing beliefs about land ownership and religion, and this sometimes resulted in conflict.
The different between relationship and ownership is that, relationship means how closer are you with a person. While ownership means a person who has something, examples car, motorcycle, bag, phone, e.t.c.
There is no private land ownership under communism.
Marion Dunn has written: 'Management attitudes, ownership and unionisation'
Susan R Rhodes has written: 'The effects of worker ownership and control on work attitudes and behaviors' -- subject(s): Job satisfaction, Employee ownership
No, a husband does not have ownership over his wife. In a healthy and equal relationship, both partners have autonomy and equal rights.
The relationship between British settlers and Native Americans was complex and often fraught with tension. Initially, some settlers engaged in trade and cooperation with Indigenous tribes, but this quickly deteriorated as settlers encroached on Native lands for agriculture and resources. Conflicts over land ownership and differing cultural values led to violence and displacement of Native populations. Overall, the relationship was marked by exploitation, mistrust, and broken treaties.
"We're" is a contraction for "we are." It combines the pronoun "we" with the verb "are" to show ownership, association, or relationship.
Dawes Severalty Act
private Propert ownership
Native Americans did not have a concept of land ownership. The land was for all. However, Natives did fight over territories for self preservation purposes.
Friendship Spaceship Championship Kinship Relationship Penmanship Ownership Membership Kingship
helped to restore some reservation lands to tribal ownership.