Better then in the south
There were no free African Americans in the south. In the north they were free but still discrimination kept them from expressing themselves and having rights.
They faced discrimination and limited opportunities
It depends on where you were living. While blacks were never treated entirely as equals, some states treated them far better than others, and gave them more opportunities. By most accounts, northern states had eliminated slavery by 1804. Free blacks in the north were thus able to gain access to schooling (Quakers were among the Christian denominations most active in opening schools that blacks could attend); by the early 1820s, there is evidence that some blacks were attending universities. Northern blacks also were able to open small businesses, as carpenters or painters or other kinds of tradesmen. A few became teachers or clergy. In the south, with few exceptions, blacks were still enslaved in 1815, and were thus unable to gain any measure of equality. One southern city with a few free black and mixed-race residents was New Orleans, but for the most part, blacks who lived in the south did so under the condition of servitude.
The question is flawed due to a contradictory premise and therefore cannot be answered. There is no such thing as a "free slave". If one is a slave one is inherently not free, if one is free one is inherently not a slave. It is akin to asking what percentage of the water in the Atlantic ocean is dry? However, if by "free slaves" you meant free Blacks (to be Black was not inherently to be a slave as there were Blacks who not only were free, but owned both land and slaves in the Antebellum South), then an answer to that can be provided. However, in an exact or statistical manner I cannot provide the answer, for in all of the numerous reading I have engaged in on this topic never have I encountered statistics relaying that information. I am not certain if it is known. However (again), the number of free Blacks would have varied in each state. The largest percentage of free, property owning Blacks would have most likely been in Louisiana. Louisiana was the most liberal (in the literal sense as opposed to the political sense) toward free Blacks.
Free blacks were not helped by education reform.
in the 1860's there was 1253 blacks in the south
"Blacks in the north", "Freedom at last", "Not your slave", "Life of a free black", "Free blacks among the whites", "Being a free black during a time of slavery".
well im not pretty sure how much in the 1861 but in 1860 there was 221,000 free blacks were in the north. hope that help :)
They were free but everyone was very recist towards them and they were not aloud to go to school or any places until after the blacks were treated equally.
There were no free African Americans in the south. In the north they were free but still discrimination kept them from expressing themselves and having rights.
No, because there were free Blacks and then there were slaves, so they were considered completely different classes. However, even free Blacks weren't treated fairly.
They faced discrimination and limited opportunities
Some were conscripted [drafted ] and probably did not want to fight, some free Blacks from the North enlisted, and wanted to fight to free enslaved Blacks.
They couldn't have certain jobs or live in certain states.
the blacks who gained their freedom in the north they founded schools and churches to advance their rights and communties.
they were happy to be slaves..they did not want to be free
Similarities - limited/no rights; still discriminated; could not become citizens Differences - Slaves - treated as property; worked 12-14 hours Free Blacks - worked as servants by CHOICE; worked less hours; more jobs to choose from;