The Dred Scott decision, which denied citizenship to African Americans and upheld the rights of slave owners, would have been met with outrage and despair among abolitionists and supporters of civil rights. Many would have viewed it as a blatant violation of fundamental human rights and a step backwards for justice and equality in America. The ruling underscored the deep divisions in the country and intensified the fight against slavery, motivating activists to push even harder for abolition and civil rights. Overall, it would have been seen as a catalyst for further activism and resistance against systemic racism.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
By declaring that the Constitution protected slavery throughout the USA, the Supreme Court drove the two sides further apart, and helped to bring war closer.
Scott was a slave and could not bring suit
No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
it was a slave sueing for his freedom and lost. the aboltionist in north were shocked and it also said Congress can not ban slavery in teritorys
The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
I would imagine very disappointed. He was told he was property, didn't have rights, and wasn't a citizen. He had to stay with his owner.
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?