yes it is because im a child who needs it
Yes, children did go to school in the 1900s. However, school attendance and access to education varied depending on factors such as location, socioeconomic status, and gender. In many developed countries, compulsory education laws were gradually implemented during this time, making education more accessible to children.
Milton Hershey School began accepting girls in 1976. Originally founded in 1909 as a boys' school, the decision to include girls was part of a broader effort to serve a more diverse population and address the needs of children in the community. This change allowed the school to expand its mission of providing quality education and support to both boys and girls in need.
Non-reservation based Indian populations tend to participate more at the local and state levels of government and to use social services provided by those levels of government for their needs. In addition, children who live on reservations have more opportunities to attend a tribal school than Indian children not living on a reservation.
children had to plough the feilds,feed the animails and lots more
The ubiquity of "common" schools in the United States belies both the long effort to establish a system of publicly supported elementary and secondary schools and the many controversies that have attended public schools before and since their creation. The belief that public, or free, schools and pauper schools were synonymous terms, and that such schools were only for children of the poor, long hampered the acceptance of the idea that publicly supported schools could and should exist for all children, regardless of social class, gender, religion, ethnicity, or country of origin. Moreover, the European and colonial insistence that responsible parents need concern themselves only with the education of their own children through the avenues of the family, church, or the voluntary efforts of like-minded citizens only slowly gave way to the conviction that publicly supported common schools might serve all children equally, and in so doing advance the moral, social, and economic interests so vital to the nation.Read more: Common School Movement - Colonial and Republican Schooling, Changes in the Antebellum Era, The Rise of the Common School - StateUniversity.com http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1871/Common-School-Movement.html#ixzz2Nwh0LVXm
children that eat healthy in the morning are more attentive in school than children that children that don’t
Sunday school is more of a deeper talk and is usually held before the actual gathering time. Children's church is usually during the service and is for children which Sunday school could be for grown ups
French children go to school on Mondays-Tuesdays, Wednesdays (morning only until you go to high school), Thursdays and Fridays. In high school there may be classes on Saturday mornings. More and more primary schools run a four-day schedule, meaning that the children have no more class on wednesdays; but as the number of hours in class per year are the same, that means shorter holidays.
New laws requiring younger children to go to school
Most children attend school, more boys than girls though
New laws requiring younger children to go to school.
True
Children are given health exams before entering school so that they don't bring sickness to others. They are given vaccines, checked for contagious diseases, and more.
Britain children have to be more proper.
something more interesting than the day before
new laws required children to attend school
I'm not sure I understand your question. What phrase are you asking about, "children for school?" If that is what you mean, it could be correct depending on how it is used in the sentence. For example, a sentence such as "We must prepare the children for school." would be correct. If you make your question a bit clearer I could help more.