false
Ordinance of 1787
That a state had the right to ignore a law, if it thought the law was unconstitutional
Breaking the law is always wrong in the eyes of the law. Breaking the law for a greater good or individual belief may be morally right, but it is not a defense recognized by the state.
The first Civil Rights Acts were passed in 1866, 1870, 1871, and 1875. Those acts tried to protect the ex-slaves rights and freedoms, like the right to sue, to be heard in jury trials, and the right to hold property. The Fourteenth Amendment, 1866, guaranteed all citizens of the US and all citizens in the states in which they lived, equal treatment under the law. It intended to prevent states from taking away the civil rights protected by the Constitution, from ex-slaves. As reconstruction ended and the Blacks lost political power in the South, there was no more federal civil rights legislation until The Civil Rights Acts of 1957 and 1960.
It means that the government must follow the same fair rules in all cases brought to trial.
Napoleonic Code
Right to citizenship. Guaranteed equal protection under the law
Right to citizenship. Guaranteed equal protection under the law
*odd future wolf gang kill them all* (_golf_wang_)
The Maryland Tolerance Act
The Law is that All Drivers on public roads maintain proof of financial responsibility regardless of age.
The Oregon Case of 1925 guaranteed the right of private schools. The Oregon legislature passed a law that required all children to attend public schools.
Technically, yes. As part of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, we are guaranteed by law the right to live life our own way. We are guaranteed by law the right to live life whichever way makes us happy.
no. when it comes to the right-of-way traffic regulations, the reality is the law gives no driver the right-of-way. traffic regulations only state who must yield the right-of-way.
The Supreme Court would strike it down as being unconstitutional.
ALL state's laws prohibit this.
Napoleonic Code