the granger laws were legal
Farmers had political power
The Supreme Court ruled that Dred Scott's owner did not lose her property rights by taking him to a free State (Illinois); this gave persons who were opposed to slavery the not-unreasonable impression that the Supreme Court would, sooner or later, rule that no State could ban slavery.
No. He came to Mt. Vernon as an attorney to argue a case at the Illinois Supreme Court which is now the Illinois 5th District Appellate Court in Mt. Vernon.
The Granger laws were legal -Apex
That Scott had no right to argue in court
The Granger laws were legal.
who decides whether or not the supreme court will review a case
a simple majority
The supreme court decided to throw out the case.
Supreme Court case of Munn v Illinois showed that states need to regulate certain businesses
Before their cases is decided before the Supreme court of the United States, the parties must make their final submissions.
In 1803, Marshall decided a case that increased the power of the supreme court.
Farmers had political power
He took matters into his own hands
If you're talking about the Supreme Court case, then Illinois "won" in the sense that it got to use the evidence.
The Supreme Court met in Washington, D.C. when it decided the Dred Scott case. It has met in Washington for every case since February 1801.
Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964)