Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
They had good presidents, an organized government, people to fight, farms to supple food, and weapons.
they both have taxes
Badly. Differently. Significantly.
The north had very little knowledge of the south's land. The south had an extremely poor economy.
The civil war was fought by the North and the South, both parts of the U.S. Are you talking union or confederate?
They had good presidents, an organized government, people to fight, farms to supple food, and weapons.
yes the south agriculture the north industrial
impact on the south and north were many like the amenment .
The South and North both elected their own governments. The North had Lincoln, while the South had elected Davis.
they both have taxes
Badly. Differently. Significantly.
The north had very little knowledge of the south's land. The south had an extremely poor economy.
In both the Vietnam & US Civil War the south was the loser & the north was the victor.
This depends on which north and south are under discussion the north and south of Ireland North Korea and South Korea North Vietnam and South Vietnam the North and South in the American civil war North Dakota and South Dakota .... and many more.
The draft
the simialiritys between both the north and the south were both sets of leaders were predominantly dedicated, focused, and inspiring to their men.
During the US Civil War, espionage was a factor in gaining information about both the North & South. The South had spies in Washington DC and the North had spies in Richmond, Virginia.