Promises varied by treaty. Implicit promises were not to massacre or attack, others included land and money.
In 1968 the American Indian Movement (AIM) was founded with the intent to pressure the US Government into compliance with treaties it signed. Several conflicts resulted in the US Government making more broken promises about fulfilling the 4,000 treaties. Since this time several branches of the AIM have attempted to gain sponsorship before the United Nations, and the world court. Several options become available once this sponsorship is achieved up to and including the armed removal of the US Government from north America and return of land ownership to the tribal people. So the short answer would be; When European style governments (including the one operating in the USA) become honest.
People from every single one.
democracy
The vehicles efficient the nations more than US is people drive too much instead of walking
The same reason everyone else came to the United States -- for a "better life". But times were hard in Japan and the promises of freedom in America was appealing to people in Japan as well as other countries.
Treaties 6, 7, and 8, signed between the Canadian government and Alberta's First Nations, include promises of land rights, the provision of annual payments, and the assurance of hunting, fishing, and trapping rights. The treaties also commit the government to provide assistance in education, health care, and farming support to help improve the living conditions of Indigenous communities. Additionally, these treaties sought to recognize the sovereignty of First Nations over their traditional lands while fostering a relationship of mutual respect and cooperation with the Crown.
Treaties varied in their impact on the relationship between First Nations people and colonial powers. Some treaties resulted in land dispossession, forced relocation, and loss of autonomy for Indigenous communities. Other treaties were beneficial, guaranteeing rights, protections, and resources for First Nations people. Overall, treaties significantly shape the ongoing relationship between Indigenous peoples and the government today.
war, treaties, and ethical treatment of people.
The first nations were people so were the signs .
People of many nations put their hopes into the League of Nations.
It wasn't a state, but the government. Eventually they did recognize the Native American tribes as independent nations and made treaties with them. Often, though, the treaties were broken by the government.
Yes, many countries still adhere to treaties today as they are legally binding agreements between nations. However, compliance with treaties can vary depending on the country and the specific treaty in question.
People break promises to people that they don't know very well.
The Department of State is responsible for interacting with other nations on behalf of the United States. It conducts diplomatic relations, negotiates treaties, and represents the U.S. in international organizations.
The US government planned to offer the Dakota people various forms of compensation in exchange for their land, primarily through treaties that included monetary payments, goods, and promises of supplies such as food and tools. These treaties were often framed as efforts to provide for the Dakota's welfare and to facilitate their transition to a more sedentary lifestyle. However, many of these agreements were not honored, leading to significant disputes and hardships for the Dakota people. Ultimately, the government's promises frequently fell short, contributing to tensions and conflicts in the region.
Two or more countries, nations, or groups of people declare in an official capacity that they will agree to a binding set of rules governing their relations to one another. The rules are set forth in the treaty and sometimes a neutral third party or group of interested parties will take the responsibility of enforcing the treaty if it is broken. The sole exception is when Europeans or Americans sign a treaty with indigenous or native people. In this case, the treaty works by tricking those people, who will later be killer or driven off their land.
In treaties between First Nations and the Canadian government, key negotiations often included land rights and ownership, resource access and management, hunting and fishing rights, and financial compensation or benefits. Additionally, many treaties addressed the provision of services such as education and healthcare, as well as the recognition of Indigenous governance and cultural practices. These negotiations aimed to establish a framework for coexistence and mutual respect between Indigenous peoples and the Canadian state.