They both gave more power to the federal government instead of the individual states
gibbons v. ogden
The commerce clause
Gibbons v. Ogden -- interstate commerce
There was no dissenting opinion in Gibbons v. Ogden,which received a unanimous vote of 6-0*; however, Justice William Johnson wrote a concurring opinion in order to present points not specifically covered in Marshall's writing.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
President James Monroe was in office in 1824. John Quincy Adams won the Presidential election that year, but didn't take office until March 4, 1825.Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Gibbons v Ogden
Federal government
Federal government
Federal government
Federal government
Federal government
Federal government
Both gave the federal government more power by expanding its authority in individual state's economic activities. McCulloch v Maryland gave the federal bank power over states, and Gibbons v Ogden gave Congress power to regulate interstate commerce.
They established the rights of power between federal and state governments.
Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the only opinion issued for McCulloch v. Maryland; the case was decided by a unanimous vote of 7-0.Case Citation:McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
a)states rights b)judicial review C)federalism D)constitutionalism E)federal authority
Congress. Marshall's decisions set a precedent allowing the Legislative Branch to exercise "implied powers," in addition to the expressed powers listed in Article I of the Constitution.