Northerners generally favored industrialization, free labor, and the expansion of railroads, which supported economic growth and urbanization. They opposed the spread of slavery into new territories, advocating for its limitation as they believed it was incompatible with a free labor economy. Additionally, many in the North supported policies that promoted education and social reforms. This divergence in economic interests and social values contributed to tensions with the Southern states leading up to the Civil War.
they opposed it
Northerners favored it because it banned slavery in the land obtained from Mexico, aka the Mexican Cession, thus making another step toward abolishing slavery. They supported this so much, that antislavery northerners created a new party, known as the Free- Soil Party, which supported the Wilmot Proviso. Southerners, however, opposed it, and wanted more land that allows slavery.
It was the North because the north gained money while south lost it because they bought most of their goods from Britain, who goods had the tariffs on them.
Northerners feared that Southern slaveowners might extend the institution of slavery into new territories and states, thereby increasing the power of the South in Congress and undermining free labor in the North. There was also concern that Southern slaveowners would attempt to spread their pro-slavery ideology and influence national policies in favor of slavery. Additionally, many Northerners worried about the potential for violence and social unrest, as tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions escalated.
Northerners mostly agreed that slavery was morally wrong and should not be expanded into new territories and states. Many believed it was a significant barrier to economic progress and social equality. Additionally, there was a strong sentiment in favor of preserving the Union, which increasingly placed them in opposition to the Southern states' pro-slavery stance. This consensus contributed to the growing tensions that ultimately led to the Civil War.
they opposed it
Yes. It would protect their manufacturing industry.
To reduce competition from foreign grain producers. Northern America industrialists increase the demand for American. This is for manufactured goods.
Southerners sought to extend slavery, already established in Texas. Northerners feared that annexation of more slave territory would tip the uneasy balance in the Senate in favor of slave states-and prompt war with Mexico.
Northerners favored it because it banned slavery in the land obtained from Mexico, aka the Mexican Cession, thus making another step toward abolishing slavery. They supported this so much, that antislavery northerners created a new party, known as the Free- Soil Party, which supported the Wilmot Proviso. Southerners, however, opposed it, and wanted more land that allows slavery.
Gettysburg was the turn of the war in the Unions favor. This showed many northerners that the war could be won. Sadly though, the Battle of Gettysburg was the bloodiest battle on our nations soil which pitted brother against brother.
The Northerners was created on 1992-04-17.
Many Northerners were for the proclamation that ended slavery. However, there were Northerners who felt like Southerners and opposed it.
It was the North because the north gained money while south lost it because they bought most of their goods from Britain, who goods had the tariffs on them.
The northerners mainly worked in factories.
The northerners added Huminism to religious topics
Northerners feared that Southern slaveowners might extend the institution of slavery into new territories and states, thereby increasing the power of the South in Congress and undermining free labor in the North. There was also concern that Southern slaveowners would attempt to spread their pro-slavery ideology and influence national policies in favor of slavery. Additionally, many Northerners worried about the potential for violence and social unrest, as tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery factions escalated.