answersLogoWhite

0

After the Civil War, sharecropping emerged as a dominant agricultural system in the South, primarily affecting the economic landscape and social structure. It bound many poor African American and white farmers in a cycle of debt and dependency, as they often had to borrow money for seeds and tools, leading to exploitative relationships with landowners. This system perpetuated poverty and limited economic mobility, effectively maintaining a form of agricultural servitude and social hierarchy that resembled pre-war conditions. Consequently, sharecropping contributed to the long-term economic challenges faced by the South, hindering its recovery and development.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about U.S. History

What systems replaced the plantation system in th south?

Sharecropping and Tenant farming were two systems that replaced the plantation system in the south after the Civil War.


In 1861-1865 the sharecropping system emerged in the south primarily as a way to?

In 1861-1865, the sharecropping system emerged in the South primarily as a way to address the economic devastation and labor shortages following the Civil War and the abolition of slavery. Landowners, lacking the labor force they once had, needed a system to cultivate their land, while freed African Americans sought opportunities for work and independence. Sharecropping allowed landowners to provide land and resources to tenants in exchange for a share of the crop, creating a cycle of debt and dependency that often left sharecroppers impoverished. This system became a prevalent means of agricultural production in the post-war South.


Where can you find graphs showing the North and South's strengths and weaknesses in the Civil War?

http://www.pocanticohills.org/civilwar/graphs.htm


What is the name of the labor system that developed throughout the South after the Civil War kept poor blacks and white working in agriculture'?

The labor system that developed in the South after the Civil War is known as sharecropping. This system allowed poor black and white farmers to work land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops produced. While it provided a means of subsistence, sharecropping often trapped families in a cycle of debt and poverty, perpetuating economic inequality in the region.


Why didnt blacks take over the south after the civil war?

Because no-one wanted them to. The Black Codes limited their ambitions, and sharecropping became the normal system of making a living from agriculture.

Related Questions

The north and south American civilwar?

South Confederate North Union


What systems replaced the plantation system in th south?

Sharecropping and Tenant farming were two systems that replaced the plantation system in the south after the Civil War.


Does sharecropping still exist in the deep south?

no


Who had control of land in labor in the south?

sharecropping


Who had control of the land and labor in the south?

sharecropping


Who control of land and labor in the south?

sharecropping


Were former slaves the only ones who were sharecroppers?

No, former slaves were not the only ones who were sharecroppers. Sharecropping system also involved poor white farmers who did not have land of their own and worked on a share basis for landowners. Sharecropping was a widespread system in the American South after the Civil War.


How did sharecropping replace the plantation system in the south?

Sharecropping replaced the plantation system in the South after the Civil War as a way for freed slaves and poor whites to work the land they previously worked as slaves. Under this system, laborers rented land and resources from landowners in exchange for a share of the crops produced, allowing for some autonomy but also perpetuating cycles of debt and poverty.


Who did sharecropping replace the plantation in the south?

Sharecropping replaced the plantation system in the South following the Civil War. It became a common arrangement where landless farmers would work on land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops they produced, often leading to cycles of debt and dependency. This system emerged in response to the loss of enslaved labor after emancipation.


How did the sharecropping system limit the freedom of African-Americans in the South?

The sharecropping system limited the freedom of African Americans in the South by binding them to a cycle of debt and dependency. Sharecroppers, often former slaves, rented land from white landowners and were required to give a significant portion of their crops as payment. This system often resulted in unfair contracts and high-interest loans for supplies, trapping African Americans in poverty and preventing them from achieving economic independence. Consequently, sharecropping perpetuated racial and economic inequalities, effectively restricting their freedom and mobility.


In 1861-1865 the sharecropping system emerged in the south primarily as a way to?

In 1861-1865, the sharecropping system emerged in the South primarily as a way to address the economic devastation and labor shortages following the Civil War and the abolition of slavery. Landowners, lacking the labor force they once had, needed a system to cultivate their land, while freed African Americans sought opportunities for work and independence. Sharecropping allowed landowners to provide land and resources to tenants in exchange for a share of the crop, creating a cycle of debt and dependency that often left sharecroppers impoverished. This system became a prevalent means of agricultural production in the post-war South.


What was the border states in the civilwar between the north and the south?

Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia, and Maryland