It was earlier - one of the causes of the war, because it raised the temperature of the debate.
It was the decision of the Supreme Court to deny freedom to a slave who had once lived on free soil, but returned to slave coutnry.
The Chief Justice based his judgment on his interpretation of the Constitution. When the Founding Fathers declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves in their definition of property.
This appeared to mean that slavery was legal in every state.
No it did not but in histroy it did.
It is likely that the Dred Scott decision had little direct effect on the Civil War. However, it is may be that the South felt more justified to pursue the war because of the decision.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.
the black side of evil
Dred Scott "Key"
No it did not but in histroy it did.
dred scotts master was dr. john Emerson
i have no clue
It is likely that the Dred Scott decision had little direct effect on the Civil War. However, it is may be that the South felt more justified to pursue the war because of the decision.
No
Couldn't have had many... seeing as it he was a slave
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
The Dred Scott decision worsened tensions before the Civil War by ruling that African Americans were not citizens and had no rights, fueling debates over slavery and states' rights.
dred Scott
No, the 14th Amendment supersedes the Dred Scott decision.
the black side of evil