Carolina was divided into SC and NC in 1729, although the actual date is open to debate.
South to north
the south were very complex in their organizing
The growing sectional debate over slavery could lead to heightened tensions between the North and South, potentially resulting in increased political polarization and the breakdown of national unity. This conflict might prompt the emergence of more radical abolitionist movements in the North, while the South could double down on defending slavery as an institution. Additionally, the debate could contribute to the escalation of violent confrontations, such as those seen in "Bleeding Kansas," and ultimately set the stage for the Civil War.
The South primarily needed free labor in the form of slaves to pick cotton and provide other forms of menial labor; the North wanted to industrialize, utilizing child labor at ridiculously low wages and dangerous, sometimes deadly, working conditions.
threatened to split national politics along the North-South lines.
The North and South debate over slavery.
Carolina was divided into SC and NC in 1729, although the actual date is open to debate.
It convinced the South that the Abolitionists were secretly planning violent insurrection. After this, North and South could only communicate in warlike dialogue. It was the end of rational debate.
The South was easily offended by the topic of slavery, and if discussed to much, the debate would cause southern representatives to leave the Constitutional Convention. The North didn't want that, or else the nation would split. Therefore, the North avoided discussion of slavery with the South.
South to north
the south were very complex in their organizing
The three-fifths clause provided for counting three-fifths of all slaves for purposes of representation in Congress.
No, and there is no debate on that!
South to North.
South to North
South Carolina Republican Debate - 2011 TV was released on: USA: 12 November 2011