answersLogoWhite

0

Scott was the slave of an army Doctor Who was posted to the North, and rather unwisely took his slave with him.

In the North, a slave would be granted his freedom automatically - if he applied for it. Scott did not apply for it.

Eventually, the two of them returned to slave country, the doctor died, and the slave was left to his family in the will.

It was only then that Scott applied for his freedom, hoping to qualify under the 'Once free, always free' tradition.

The local judges had never dealt with this kind of retro-appeal before, and so it eventually reached the Supreme Court.

Not surprisingly, the Court rejected Scott's application. But their verdict was delivered in terms that greatly provoked the Northern Abolitionists.

The elderly Chief Justice (ironically a one-time Abolitionist) chose this moment to interpret the Constitution precisely as he believed the Founding Fathers would have seen it in 1776. When they declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves in their definition of property.

This meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union. Of course, the South rejoiced at this official endorsement of slavery. And the Northern Abolitionists were equally horrified.

The Dred Scott decision is one of the issues that drove the two sides further apart, and closer to war.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What was the judges decision in the Dred Scott Case?

it made slavery and the western territory


What did the supreme court in its decision in the dred Scott case?

The Supreme Court eventually decided to give Dred Scott his freedom. They made that decision because they thought that it would end the huge slavery crisis. A few weeks after Dred Scott was freed, he sadly died. :(


Roger B. Taney?

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court when Dred Scott decision was made


What describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

the decision made slavery legal in all us territories that were not yet states


Famous supreme court decision made during president Buchanan's term?

dred scott aka a n****r


What Supreme Court decision in effect meant that the Constitution protected slavery?

The decision on Dred Scott vs. Sanford was made by the US Supreme Court on March 6, 1857. For all practical purposes, the Court ruled that slavery was legal and that slaves were property.


What big supreme court decision was made during James Buchanan's presidency?

The Dred Scott decision was handed down soon after Buchanan took office in1857.


Which statement best describes the Dred Scott v. Sanford Supreme Court decision?

The decision made slavery legal in all U.S. territories that were not yet states.


Did democrats support dred Scott law?

No, Democrats did not support the Dred Scott decision. The decision was made by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1857, and it was predominantly supported by Southern Democrats who wanted to protect the institution of slavery. The decision ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not considered citizens and therefore did not have standing to sue in federal court.


What impact did dred Scott decision have on the lives of African American slaves?

Made their prospects of freedom look more remote than ever.


What did the Dred Scott Decision do?

The Dred Scott Decision was a ruling that people of African descent who were brought to the US as slaves (and their descendants) would not be protected by the Constitution and could never be American citizens.


How did the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision affect all of the territories in the U.S.?

The decision made slaves property and said they didn't have rights of citizens, so no matter where they lived they were still property.