john calhoon
No. Slavery is no longer legal in America, therefore dismissing the compromise which stated that slaves were counted as 3/5th of a person regarding representation and taxation for states.
it is a Compromise, which stipulates that three/fifths of the slave population would be counted for purposes of representation.
In offering a compromise, each person gets a little of what he or she wanted so there is some satisfaction with the result etc
The Dred Scott Supreme Court case had a profound effect on both Dred Scott's quest for freedom and the political landscape regarding slavery in the United States. The Court ruled that Scott, as an enslaved person, was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue for his freedom, effectively denying him and others like him any legal recourse. Additionally, the decision invalidated the Missouri Compromise by declaring that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories, exacerbating tensions between free and slave states and contributing to the onset of the Civil War.
The compromise proposed by southerners that influenced the Great Compromise is known as the "Three-Fifths Compromise." This agreement determined that for purposes of taxation and representation, enslaved individuals would be counted as three-fifths of a person. This compromise helped balance the interests of slaveholding states and free states during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It played a crucial role in shaping the legislative structure of the United States.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 admitted Maine as a "free" state and Missouri as a "slave" state. As part of the deal, slavery will be, from then on, prohibited north of parallel 36°30', with the exception of the state of Missouri which was located north of that parallel.Section 14 of the Constitution states that all citizens of the United States are subject to the jurisdiction of the country. Therefore, no other state may enforce a law that may limit the privileges provided by the being a citizen of the country. The compromise is clearly making a difference between the privileges of citizens of the country according to the place they live.Section 32 of the Constitution states that no person is entitled to a different set of emoluments (or payments he receives for the work he or she does) than those from the community he lives. The Missouri compromise also goes against this enactment due to the fact that slaves are clearly getting separate forms of payment.
I think it was the 3/5th compromise
Every person in Missouri is entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness
understand the other person point of view
A person mentally incompetent is disqualified from voting in Missouri.
compromise
some person
There was only one compromise regarding slavery and it was the three-fifths compromise which stated that slaves would be counted as three-fifths of a person for purposes of assigning House of Representative seats. Another compromise during the Constitutional convention was the Great compromise which created a bicameral legislature and the creation of the electoral college for Presidential elections.
vote.
The Three-Fifths Compromise meant that a black person was 3/5 of a person. The compromise put off any real final solution to the slavery question until it got bad enough to cause the American Civil War.
Slaves were 3/5 of a person
No. Slavery is no longer legal in America, therefore dismissing the compromise which stated that slaves were counted as 3/5th of a person regarding representation and taxation for states.