Southerners argued that states' rights were violated by the evolution of slavery because they believed that individual states should have the authority to determine their own laws regarding slavery without federal intervention. They viewed federal actions aimed at restricting or abolishing slavery as an infringement on their sovereignty and autonomy. This perspective was rooted in a commitment to the Constitution, which they interpreted as allowing for the protection of their economic and social systems based on slave labor. Consequently, they framed the debate as a matter of preserving their rights as states against what they perceived as overreach by the federal government.
The Southerners believed that the teriffs violated their states rights. PS. DeDe_swagg01 on instagram follow me.
Northerners generally viewed slavery as morally wrong and a barrier to social progress, leading many to advocate for abolition and the rights of African Americans. In contrast, Southerners saw slavery as an essential part of their agricultural economy and social structure, justifying it as a necessary institution for their way of life. This fundamental disagreement over slavery contributed to the growing tensions between the North and South, ultimately culminating in the Civil War.
The political ideas of the Radical Republicans were the strict policies of slavery. Many Southerners still refused to accept abolishing slavery in the 14th Amendment and believed Africans should not have equal rights.
people get upset
The South advocated Slavery and States Rights.
The Southerners believed that the teriffs violated their states rights. PS. DeDe_swagg01 on instagram follow me.
their states rights.
Southerners argued that the abolition of slavery violated states' rights because they believed that each state had the authority to determine its own laws and governance, including the legality of slavery. They contended that the federal government overstepped its constitutional boundaries by interfering in what they viewed as a state matter. This perspective was rooted in a broader belief in the sovereignty of states and a resistance to federal authority. Thus, they framed the abolition of slavery as an infringement on their rights and autonomy as states.
amistad shows the slavery era and the slave trade. the rights violated in the film would be the right to freedom or the violation of freedom.
State's rights
Southerners called for states' rights and the preservation of the institution of slavery to protect their right to own slaves. They argued that the federal government should not interfere with the laws of individual states regarding slavery.
Abolitionists believed that slavery was morally wrong and should be abolished because it violated the principles of equality and human rights. They advocated for the immediate emancipation of enslaved individuals and the end of the institution of slavery.
Non, slaves had no rights. They were considered property. However, by modern standards, they had all their rights violated.
all of them,Human rights violation include many things like:violatio of the following: Ethnic cleansing in Darfur Abuses in conflict Slavery Child soldiers
Southerners opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to ban slavery in territories acquired from Mexico, which threatened the balance of power between slave and free states in the U.S. They believed it went against their rights to bring slaves into new territories and feared it could lead to the restriction of slavery in existing states.
A government in power may argue that rights can be violated if
Southerners typically supported slavery because the south's major crop was cotton which was difficult to pick so they get slaves to do it. Northerners opposed slavery mainly because they had no need for it because of the rocky soil.