So the balance of slave to free states were equal in congress
The northern states did want Missouri admitted to the union as a slave state so as to balance the free slave trade.
The liked it because there was a balance of free and slave states and representation in congress.
The southern states wanted the new states to become slave states to maintain the balance of power between free and slave states in Congress. This was crucial for preserving their economic interests and way of life, which heavily relied on slavery. By ensuring new states permitted slavery, they aimed to protect their political influence and prevent the abolitionist movement from gaining strength.
Northern states generally sought to limit or abolish slavery, reflecting their growing abolitionist sentiments and economic interests that did not rely on slave labor. Many favored gradual emancipation and the promotion of free labor as a more effective economic model. The desire to prevent the expansion of slavery into new territories and states was also a significant concern, as it would maintain a balance of power in Congress between free and slave states.
they didnt want to mess up the balance of free sates and slave states
because there would be inbalance between slave and free states
they wanted to be admitted as a free state
Integrated, Slave-free, and equal.
The northern states did want Missouri admitted to the union as a slave state so as to balance the free slave trade.
They want to have free states for a slave state.
The liked it because there was a balance of free and slave states and representation in congress.
Before the Civil War, there was a perfect balance between "slave" states and "free" states. Neither side could budge the other, and no new states could be admitted to the Union without a vote of the Congress - more specifically, the Senate. So new states were admitted in pairs, one slave and one free, to preserve the balance. If one new "slave" state had been admitted to the Union, the majority of slave state senators would have been able to outvote the "free" state senators and admit more "slave" states. The balance was shattered when the southern states seceded from the United States, and the Civil War settled the issue - at the cost of a half-million dead.
People that lived in free states were against slavery and didn't want it to be expanded. Also, the government tried to keep the amount of slave states and non-slave states equal, so adding a new slave state would also require adding a new non-slave state.
In California's state constitution they wanted to be admitted into the union as a free state because miner during the gold rush didn't want to have to compete with slave labor. Southern slave owners didn't want that because it would offset the 15 free states and 15 slaves state balance in the senate. If another free state was added the south would lose power. The south feared if they lost power northerners would abolish slavery.
The southern states agreed that congress could regulate trade between other nations and between the states. In return, the Northern states agreed that Congress could not tax exports and would not interfere with the slave trade before 1808.
Because it was getting harder to create new slave-states, so the South was increasingly getting out-voted in Congress, which then tended to pass laws favorable to the North.
no it was slave free