After the Civil War, many small farms consolidated into larger plantations due to economic pressures and the need for greater efficiency. The abolition of slavery disrupted labor systems, and former enslaved people often lacked the resources to sustain independent farms. Additionally, the rise of cash crops and the demand for production led farmers to pool resources to compete in a changing agricultural market. This trend was further fueled by the availability of land and financing options that favored larger-scale operations.
small farms
small farms
northern farms were mainly family farms southern farms more like plantations where based on a slave economy
New England geography, with its hilly terrain lent itself to small, isolated, independent farms which could be worked by small families. Vast southern plantations demanded large numbers of farmhands to work the large cash crops, and others to process or refine the crops into finished goods.
South- tobacco plantations- indentured servants- slaveryNew England- trade- small farms- fishing (New England was said to be built on "God and cod")- little need for slavery or indentured servitude
yes, people in Georgia did have small farms and large plantations.
Southern colonies had rich soil and warm climate
Southern plantations were large and needed many workers, but most southern colonists lived on small family farms. plantations, but small farms were much more common.
small farms
small farms
mabye maybe not...:p
northern farms were mainly family farms southern farms more like plantations where based on a slave economy
The planters had large plantations and were rich and the yeoman had small farms and were poor.
slavery
Georgia's founders wanted georgia to be a colony of small farms, not large plantations. Therefore slavery was banned. -christian
No. Plantations were only in the south and not the middle colonies. They had small cash crop farms.
Small farms.Large plantations