because they suck 8======D
True. During the 19th century, the southern United States had significantly fewer factories compared to the industrialized North. The economy of the South was primarily agrarian, relying heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production, rather than industrial manufacturing. This lack of industrialization contributed to the economic disparities between the two regions.
The percentage of factories in the North compared to the South posed a significant problem for southern cotton growers, as it created a dependency on Northern industries for processing and manufacturing. This imbalance limited the South's economic autonomy and made it vulnerable to fluctuations in Northern demand. Additionally, the concentration of manufacturing in the North meant that Southern growers had fewer options for selling their cotton, often leading to lower prices and reduced profits. Ultimately, this disparity contributed to the economic divide between the two regions.
Factories are needed to make goods. During the war they made uniforms, supplies, guns, weapons and other necessary items. After the war they were needed to create the things needed to rebuild.
I believe the question refers to the United States. The term "resources" has many categories. It could mean fewer skilled workers as they are a "resource". It could also mean resources in "technology". And it could mean "natural resources".In any area of resources concerning any nation, not just the United States, there would have to be a way of compensating for fewer resources. Generally speaking ( and that is all that I can answer as the question is too broad ) The USA would either have to buy more resources or live without them. In either case the standard of living would drop.
During the Civil War, the Northern states had approximately 110,000 factories, which produced a significant majority of the nation's industrial output. This industrial advantage included the production of weapons, ammunition, and other war materials, allowing the Union to sustain its military efforts effectively. In contrast, the South had far fewer factories, around 20,000, which limited its capacity to equip and supply its troops. This disparity in industrial resources played a crucial role in the outcome of the war.
They represent the 50 states in the United States. When there were fewer states, there were fewer stars.
True. During the 19th century, the southern United States had significantly fewer factories compared to the industrialized North. The economy of the South was primarily agrarian, relying heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton production, rather than industrial manufacturing. This lack of industrialization contributed to the economic disparities between the two regions.
no
They had far fewer large cities than the southern states. They generally had less enslaved labor than the southern states.
There were many fewer of them.
Fewer autopsies have been performed in the United States during the past 10-20 years
Travel was too dangerous
Some states require more heating. Some states require more air conditioning. Some states have more factories and fewer farms.
The Midwest region of the United States, particularly states like Illinois, Iowa, and Indiana, have fewer mountains compared to regions like the West Coast or the Rocky Mountains. These states are known for their relatively flat terrain and rolling plains.
The West part of the United States has fewer mountains.
Alternating hemiplegia is quite rare, with fewer than 100 diagnosed cases in the United States, and fewer than 240 diagnosed patients worldwide.
By 1995, fewer than 500 cases of babesiosis had been reported in the United States