0
Why did the southern states want slaves to count toward their populations?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
The Southerners wanted more representatives in the House of Representatives, so they wanted slaves to count as people in order to inflate their numbers. The Northerners argued that since slaves had no rights to elect those representatives, they should not be counted (in order to give Northerners more relative representation). This debate was what resulted in the Three-Fifths Compromise, wherein slaves were counted as three-fifths of a person.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 7y agoEach state's representation both in Congress and the Electoral College are determined by population. By including slaves (one slave was counted as 3/5 of a person), southern states could have larger representation, even though slaves weren't able to vote or hold office.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoBecause the number of representatives each state gets in the House of Representatives is based on its population.
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThe Slaves could not represent themselves, and the south still wanted them to have the bonus voting units in the house of representatives.
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoThis is because then they would have more votes in the House of Representatives.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did the Northern and Southern attitudes slavery differ?
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.
How did the northern and southern attitudes towards slavery differ?
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.
Why did the southern slave owners fear the northern attitudes toward slavery?
The loss of slavery would threaten the southern economy
What was the result of US covert actions in Latin America and the Middle East?
One result of U.S. covert actions in Latin America and the Middle East was rising resentment among those populations toward the United States. An additional result was an increasingly unstable political environment.
In the late nineteenth century southern agriculture was characterized by what?
was characterized by a trend toward diversification of crops
How did the Northern and Southern attitudes slavery differ?
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.
Which was not a contribution to the shift of the Southern economy toward slavery?
slaves
How did the northern and southern attitudes towards slavery differ?
the northern and southern states differed in their attitudes toward slavery because the northern states were against slavery while the southern states were all for slavery, in fact they had slaves. The northern and southern states disagreed about it so much that it caused a war, known as the civil war.
What was the purpose of the three fifths compromise?
Although slaves couldn't vote, the Southern states wanted to count them for the purpose of increasing their representation in the House of Representatives. The Northern states didn't want to count slaves at all because the South insisted slaves were property and not persons. The Three Fifths Compromise was was just that...a compromise that allowed the South to count three-fifths of the slaves towards their total population which ultimately gave the South greater representation in congress than they would otherwise have had.
The immediate effect of the American Revolution upon slavery was that?
Northern States Moved toward Emancipation of their slave and most southern states resticted the importation of salves.. -Sirchain *I am not sure what the correct answer is, but i felt the need to inform anyone reading this answer that it is wrong; Southern states made no moves to restrict the importation of slaves and the Northern States did not see slavery as a major issue at this point in history. -Sephcmc
Why did southern colonies increasingly turn toward slavery?
IN the south they had more farms, therefore they needed slaves to run the farms
Proposed that slaves be partially counted toward a states population?
3 5th compromise
How did slavery change as a result of the American Revolution?
In the aftermath of the American Revolution, Northern states started moving toward emancipation, and many Southern states restricted the importation of slaves. The American Revolution was fought from 1765 to 1783.
Should slaves be counted toward a states population total?
The Three-Fifths Compromise, settled on in 1787, determined that slaves would count as three-fifths of a person for the purposes of representation and taxation. This decision was a contentious compromise between states with varying numbers of slaves and helped shape the balance of power between states in the federal government.
What contributed the most most toward the realization that the nation needed a stronger central government?
The secession of the Southern states contributed the most toward the realization that the nation needed a stronger central government . Prior to this the states simply had a cooperative agreement.
What President pushed for a soft Reconstruction with the Southern States and pleaded for a peace with malice toward none and a new birth of American freedom?
lincoln
What compromise solved the issue of how to count slaves toward the population?
The Three-Fifths Compromisewas a compromise between Southern and Northern states reached during the Philadelphia Convention of 1787 in which three-fifths of the enumerated population of slaves would be counted for representation purposes regarding both the distribution of taxes and the apportionment of the members of the United States House of Representatives. It was proposed by delegates James Wilsonand Roger Sherman.
