It is important as historians to recognise the difference because opinions are not necessarily true, or what happened. You can have 2 or more opinions that go against eachother, but there's only one fact. Opinions also show more of the feeling of the time (whether people liked or disliked certain events), rather than what actually happened. Some effects that are fact, were sparked off by opinions, they are interlinked, but definitely different.
Opinions varied then just as opinions vary now. Often the difference can cause conflict including war.
The answer is arguable. I say that politically, Gettysburg was the most important battle. Strategically, Vicksburg was the most important.
The two opposing opinions on which side that America should support in the French Revolution were to side with the French, since they helped the United States in the American Revolution, or to side with the British, since they were the United States's most important trading partner.
Had differing opinions on how to achieve equality
A toleration
Historians have different interpretations because they all have different opinions.
Bias can be useful to historians by allowing them to learn about people's opinions and beliefs.
Subjectivity and opinions are used to express personal perspectives, feelings, and beliefs on a particular topic. These can vary greatly from person to person and are often influenced by individual experiences, biases, and values. It's important to recognize and respect differing viewpoints when considering subjective information and opinions.
A difference of Opinions
Well the opinions of the supreme court are really important. They can tell if your guilty or not.
Interpretations based on emotions or opinions are subjective and may vary between individuals. They are influenced by personal experiences, beliefs, and values, and may not always be universally agreeable or verifiable. It's important to recognize and acknowledge when sharing interpretations based on emotions or opinions.
If you don't who will?
Well the opinions of the supreme court are really important. They can tell if your guilty or not.
Yes, because people need to know what others think in their opinions
A journalist commentator is a recognized and respected figure. On the contrary, opinions are for the general public.
Yes they do everyone is entitled to something different.
Well, Allah (the Muslim God) certainly does. I can't comment on the opinions of other Gods on this issue.