answersLogoWhite

0

Slavery was and is morally wrong.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is slavery a conflict of the Revolutionary War?

Slavery is not a conflict of the Revolutionary war.


Why did the US Congress agree to the Missouri Compromise?

To address the conflict over slavery


What is the north-south conflict?

The North South conflict in the United States of America was over slavery. The South wanted slavery and the North wanted to abolish slavery.


What is north south conflict?

The North South conflict in the United States of America was over slavery. The South wanted slavery and the North wanted to abolish slavery.


What was the term used by the newspapers to describe the conflict over slavery in kansas?

"Bleeding Kansas" was the term used by newspapers to describe the conflict over slavery in Kansas, which erupted in violence between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the 1850s.


What is true about the issue of slavery?

Slavery was one cause of conflict between the north and the south.


What was the first US territory to spill blood in an internal conflict over slavery?

The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act caused an internal conflict. As a territory, Kansas was the first territory to have an armed and bloody conflict over slavery.


Who is William Seward addressing in his Irrepressible Conflict speech about abolishing slavery?

In his "Irrepressible Conflict" speech, William Seward addresses both the American public and political leaders of his time, urging them to confront the issue of slavery head-on. He argues that the conflict between freedom and slavery is fundamental and cannot be avoided. Seward aims to rally support for the abolitionist cause, emphasizing the moral imperative to end slavery and the inevitability of conflict if the issue remains unresolved.


Why did congress agree to the Missouri?

To address the conflict over slavery


What was the internal conflict of Christopher Columbus?

I believe that the internal conflict with Christopher Columbus was that her was "know" for a thief and for slavery... did that help?


What is the primary conflict between these two accounts of slavery?

The main conflict between the two accounts of slavery lies in the perspectives on power dynamics and human rights. One may emphasize the economic benefits of slavery, while the other highlights the moral injustices and human suffering inflicted by the institution.


What was the conflict between the Northern and Southern States as territories from the Louisiana Purchase apply for statehood?

The major source of conflict over granting statehood was the slavery question-- would slavery be allowed in the new state?