0
What else can I help you with?
In 1956 there were more what than factory workers for the first time in the history of the United states?
White-collar workers.
What is behind the 2 hidden doors in fallout 3?
You're going to have to be more specific than that. There are lots of hidden doors in Fallout 3.
Do Roman senators have slaves?
The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.The Roman senators were more than likely the largest group of slave owners beside the emperor.
Why did white-collar workers have more time off than the blue-collar workers?
They could stop working when the boss went home.
What did white collar have more time off than blue collar workers?
In my experience, white collars frequently set their own schedules
Can you have more than one file on Fallout 3?
Yes you can. And multiple save slots.
Would slave children get beat as bad as adults?
Slave men were beat more than slave women and children.
Why are bottle caps currency in fallout?
because there more common than normal paper money
Why did white collar workers more time off than blue collar workers?
White collar workers were more likely to be longer term employees with seniority and accrued benefits vs. hourly/labor employees receiving no such vacation from the union hall.
Why were there different classes of slaves?
The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.The Romans did not actually have classes of slaves. A slave was a slave; slavery was a class. However a slave, depending upon his/her education and skills had status. For example a secretary had more status than a litter bearer and a city slave had more status than a rural worker in some cases. Any responsible position held by a slave raised his/her status. The Romans did have names for the jobs that a slave performed, such as "cantrix" for a singer, "agaso" for a groom, but these were job descriptions rather than classes.
What is a thesis statement on Japan?
There is more to Japan than nuclear fallout causing awesome society traits.
Is sky rim better than fallout 4?
I personally love both. Skyrim's good if you like dragons and the old ages. Fallout's more like being a survivor in a world destroyed by atomic war. Based on what you are looking for, Fallout's more realistic, but Skyrim can have mods attached to it. This makes it more realistic, for example you can die of hyperthermia.
