The morality of having a pet can depend on various factors, including how the animal is treated and the conditions of its care. Many argue that providing a loving home and meeting the needs of an animal can be a compassionate act. However, concerns arise regarding the ethical implications of captivity, especially for species that require specific habitats or social structures. Ultimately, responsible pet ownership and a commitment to the animal's well-being can make having a pet morally acceptable.
The word that means morally right is "virtuous."
The word righteousness is a noun.
yes, there is. Some would argue that the taking of life (killing someone) is morally wrong. A counter-argument might be if in self-defence, the taking of a life might be morally right, since it preserves another's life. However, this does not contradict the point that the taking of a life is still morally wrong. Indeed, the taking of a life can be both morally right and morally wrong.
The term morally wrong refers to an act of human behavior that is not accepted as right by society.
Yes, it is.
Study of what is morally right and wrong.
It is not morally right for anybody to impose their religious beliefs on anybody else, and this is especially wrong if they are in a position of power.
The phrase is morally defective. It means a person who has totally lost his or her sense of right and wrong. (Alternate phrase: morally bankrupt)
pet have right you give food properly,neat and clean. Pet have right to provide them good accommodation. take pet to the outside so pet can have the fresh air.
absolutely.
This is an ethical claim, specifically a normative claim about what is morally right or wrong. It suggests that not voting is morally wrong based on certain ethical beliefs or principles.
legally -- no. Morally -- yes.