What is Lady Goo Goo a copywrite of?

Answer 1

Nothing. Let's break it down:

The word is "copyright", not "copywrite". "Copywriter" is a word, and I suppose "copywrite" could be a verb derived from that word (What does a copywriter do? Well, actually, he writes copy, but one can understand how "copywrite" might be used as an alternative.)

Spelling quibbles aside, you can't "copyright" a word or short phrase. You can trademark it provided it's distinctive enough.

Okay, we'll put that aside and assume you actually used "trademark" (as you should have). It turns out that Lady Gaga recently won an injunction against the company that attempted to introduce an animated children's character named Lady Goo Goo. So "Lady Goo Goo" cannot have a valid trademark, as a British court has decided that it infringes upon Lady Gaga's "goodwill". Technically, this decision is only binding in the UK; it could potentially be trademarked in the US, especially if instead of a singing monster it were used for some very different product ... a type of Goo Goo Cluster (a sort of candy) marketed specifically for women, perhaps ... since the makers of Goo Goo Clusters would have a much stronger argument that a) the name is based on their existing trademark, and b) there's no possibility of confusion between the candy and the singer (compare "Baby Ruth", which successfully survived a court challenge from the Baseball player Babe Ruth).