godfather part 2 is better because you get to create your player.
i used to have "The Godfather" on PS2 & i now have "The Godfather II" on PS3. What I think is that, the GF2 is better for graphics but the GF1 is more fun to play.
They are both great games. As of today godfather is better. If you are asking what was better when it came out I would say San Andreas was way bigger and more hyped. San Andreas was released on the older systems (PS2's and xbox) which absouslty makes the graphics not as good. If your not a big fan of graphics I would reccomend GTA sa. God father has better graphics. The story of gta sa in my opinion was better but thats up for you to decide:). Hope you got some info. This is coming from someone who loves GTA.
due to the dissapointing sales of godfather 2, no.
"no that's gta liberty city.....good game!" no gta 2 is gta 2. literally what its called
mafia 2
GTA 4 is better 4 a kid and saints row 2 is a horrible game for kids
NO!
vfg
The Godfather 2 is awesome , alot of new things , but its really short compared to the godfather 1 , i would take godfather 1 actually
I think, movie-wise, that number one was better...thats just me.But in the book, all the movies are piled in to one book...or that's what i was told
Well, truthfully, GTA IV has better graphics, storyline, and is more realistic, but Saints Row 2 is pretty much GTA IV on LSD. I suppose some people are into that.
No, definatelly not. GTA 3 is kinda old, it was released in 2001. After this, they released GTA VICE CITY (2002) and GTA SAN ANDREAS (2004). GTA 4 is a new game, released in 2008. It's much modern than GTA 3. GTA 3 is only 2 cd's for the game (pc version), yet GTA 4 is 4 dvd's. That give an idea of how different the graphics and everything is.