Why are some defendants held in pretrial detention?

What is the most successful pretrial release program?

The most successful form of pretrial release is are those who put up real property. The next successful form of pretrial release are thos which involve a bail bondsmen to supervise and guarantee the release. They remaining forms of release whether it be a government pretrial release program or signature releases pale in comparison when looking at issues of failure to appear and crimes committed while on pretrial release and fugitive rates after a year.

When does a prisoner get out?

Discharge from jail and prison are similar, but there are differences as well. Generally, discharge from each depends on sentening. Jail incarceration can be of two types however: pre and post adjudication. Some pretrial defendants may be housed in jail, especially those who do not or cannot make bail. Some defendants are held over for trial due to the severity of the crime or a potential flight risk. Release from prison is most commonly of two types: dischard (completion of sentenced time), or parole (conditional release with continued supervision). There are a number of other reasons for release from prison, but generally these would be predicated by court orders.

In some courts pretrial negotiation is mandatory?

Yes.

What do French pupils do in detention?

It is standard for French pupils in detention to get some additional homework.

What state courts conduct some pretrial activities for more important ones?

In the United States, state courts often conduct pretrial activities for more significant cases, particularly in criminal matters. These pretrial activities are typically handled by trial courts, which may include district or superior courts, depending on the state. In some jurisdictions, specialized courts, such as felony courts, focus on more serious offenses and manage pretrial hearings, bail determinations, and arraignments. Additionally, some states may utilize municipal or circuit courts for pretrial proceedings before cases are escalated to higher courts.

Will you go to detention if you're tardy?

Yes. In some schools, you can go to detention even if you get one tardy. In other schools, if you get three tardys, you can go to detention too.

What is the movie detention rated?

Detention (2003) is rated R for strong violence and language, and for some drug content.

Is there such thing as a child prison?

Many countries have facilities to detain "young offenders". These are generally not called prisons but are given more pleasant sounding names like detention centres, juvenile hall, detention homes, secure detention and similar names. These may be more homey than prisons or may be reworked area in existing prisons In some countries whole families are arrested and put in prisons - spouses and children together with the criminals. In the case of illegal immigrants the parents and children will be held, sometimes for years in detention facilities. The age of criminal responsibility is a consideration for the treatment of children committing crimes. Among the owest in the world is America where children as young a 6 years can be held criminally responsible for there actions (in some states). This is more severe than most countries of the world.

Which US Supreme Court case addressed the right to post bail?

A number of US Supreme Court cases have addressed the right to post bail under various circumstances. Perhaps the best known is United States v. Salerno, 481 US 739 (1987), challenging the federal Bail Reform Act of 1984 on the grounds that it violated the defendant's Fifth Amendment Due Process rights and imposed punishment under the Eighth Amendment Excessive Bail Clause.In Salerno, the Boss and one of the Captains of the Genovese organized crime family were arrested on 29 counts of racketeering, including conspiracy to commit murder, under the US RICO statutes. The District Court ordered the two men held without bail under the provisions of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, but the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the lower court ruling, holding the decision violated substantive due process because it unreasonably interfered with the liberty rights of the defendants. As such, the Second Circuit found the Act unconstitutional on its face because detention without bail punished the individuals for anticipated future crimes."[The Bail Reform Act's] authorization of pretrial detention [on the ground of future dangerousness] [is] repugnant to the concept of substantive due process, which we believe prohibits the total deprivation of liberty simply as a means of preventing future crimes."The US Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, holding that the legislation could only be overturned as unconstitutional if "no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid." While the Court acknowledged the Act might operate unconstitutionally under some conceivable set of circumstances, that was insufficient to nullify the act because the Court only recognized the "overbreadth doctrine" (can be applied to broadly) in the context of the First Amendment.The Court further held that the Act did not violate substantive due process rights because the confinement was regulatory, not punitive (it served a purpose other than punishment). Congress intended the Act to prevent danger to the community, which the Court held was a reasonable goal. The statute protected the defendants' rights by providing for a hearing to contest the decision and by limiting the length of time the defendants could be held before trial.Salerno also alleged that a law allowing the defendants to be held without bail violated the Eighth Amendment Excessive Bail Clause by setting bail at "an infinite amount." This argument was based on Stack v. Boyle, 342 U. S. 1 (1951), in which the Court stated that "[b]ail set at a figure higher than an amount reasonably calculated [to ensure the defendant's presence at trial] is 'excessive' under the Eighth Amendment."Chief Justice Rehnquist countered that the Eighth Amendment didn't anticipate a need to hold defendants without bail, and that there were other established exceptions to the Excessive Bail Clause. In reversing the Second Circuit, Rehnquist summarized the Court's position:"In our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception. We hold that the provisions for pretrial detention in the Bail Reform Act of 1984 fall within that carefully limited exception."

What is the US Supreme Court case US v Salerno about?

The case United States v. Salerno, 481 US 739 (1987), challenged the federal Bail Reform Act of 1984 on the grounds that it violated a defendant's Fifth Amendment Due Process rights and imposed punishment under the Eighth Amendment Excessive Bail Clause.In Salerno, the Boss and one of the Captains of the Genovese organized crime family were arrested on 29 counts of racketeering, including conspiracy to commit murder, under the US RICO statutes. The District Court ordered the two men held without bail under the provisions of the Bail Reform Act of 1984, but the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the lower court ruling, holding the decision violated substantive due process because it unreasonably interfered with the liberty rights of the defendants. As such, the Second Circuit found the Act unconstitutional on its face because detention without bail punished the individuals for anticipated future crimes."[The Bail Reform Act's] authorization of pretrial detention [on the ground of future dangerousness] [is] repugnant to the concept of substantive due process, which we believe prohibits the total deprivation of liberty simply as a means of preventing future crimes."The US Supreme Court reversed the Second Circuit, holding that the legislation could only be overturned as unconstitutional if "no set of circumstances exists under which the Act would be valid." While the Court acknowledged the Act might operate unconstitutionally under some conceivable set of circumstances, that was insufficient to nullify the act because the Court only recognized the "overbreadth doctrine" (can be applied to broadly) in the context of the First Amendment.The Court further held that the Act did not violate substantive due process rights because the confinement was regulatory, not punitive (it served a purpose other than punishment). Congress intended the Act to prevent danger to the community, which the Court held was a reasonable goal. The statute protected the defendants' rights by providing for a hearing to contest the decision and by limiting the length of time the defendants could be held before trial.Salerno also alleged that a law allowing the defendants to be held without bail violated the Eighth Amendment Excessive Bail Clause by setting bail at "an infinite amount." This argument was based on Stack v. Boyle, 342 U. S. 1 (1951), in which the Court stated that "[b]ail set at a figure higher than an amount reasonably calculated [to ensure the defendant's presence at trial] is 'excessive' under the Eighth Amendment."Chief Justice Rehnquist countered that the Eighth Amendment didn't anticipate a need to hold defendants without bail, and that there were other established exceptions to the Excessive Bail Clause. In reversing the Second Circuit, Rehnquist summarized the Court's position:"In our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception. We hold that the provisions for pretrial detention in the Bail Reform Act of 1984 fall within that carefully limited exception."

Why do attorneys represent defendants?

All defendants are entitled to a presumption of innocence and a defense against their charges. Some defense attorneys are motivated by the ideals of the law, some do it for money - some do it for both.

How do you get gum to go in detention nate island?

you have to finish the comic and hell give you some gum.but i dont know if you can go in detention.