Possibly. There were several conversions for the original "ball & cap" revolvers, that changed them from "ball and cap" to metallic cartridge revolvers. HOWEVER- even when changed to fire a metallic cartridge, many are still a BLACK POWDER firearm- and will not safely fire modern high pressure SMOKELESS powder cartridges. I might find a conversion cylinder for a Colt Navy .36 caliber revolver, but the brass frame is just not going to be up to firing .357 magnum ammo.
That depends on what you are refering to, several companies make a "cylinder conversion" for several STEEL framed percussion revolvers. These conversions are "use at your own risk".
Fireworks, cannon shells, and firearm cartridges.
Depends on the cartridge, Early cartridges used black powder, Modern cartridges use smokeless powder, based on nitrocellulose and nitroglycerin. There are hundreds of different smokeless powders that have different recipes, grain shapes, and burning rates.
Rimfire cartridges are comprised of a soft lead bullet, a case most often made of brass, and the smokeless propellant (powder).
Toner cartridges are usually large and have a dry powder-like ink supply inside, while laser ink cartridges are small and compact with a liquid ink supply inside.
Yes. The original .22 rimfire cartridges were low velocity- black powder. When this changed to smokeless powder, it gave a high velocity (HV) which caused wear and tear on older guns. Guns were marked HV to indicate they could use the new ammo. It should be able to fire standard .22 Long Rifle cartridges. I would not shoot hypervelocity ammo such as Stingers or Yellow Jackets in an older gun.
The origin is in firearms. Old guns used black powder instead of cartridges, and if you let your powder get wet, your gun would not fire.
It's a replica. More replica black powder guns are made in Italy than anywhere else. I am not aware of any guns marked 'Made in Italy' being used in the Civil War.
China (modified in Illinois USA)
In the year 1898 or 1892.
The .44 S&W Special is a cartridge currently loaded with smokeless powder, as opposed to earlier cartridges such as the .44 Colt or .44 Russian. Those cartridges, generally considered obsolete, were loaded with black powder. Smokeless powder should not be used in firearms built for black powder- the pressures are too high to do so safely. You may also find .44 caliber BULLETS (not cartridges) intended for use in a black powder revolver. These are typically made of a very soft type of lead, different from the harder lead alloys (lead-tin-antimony) used in modern firearms.
Yes, But it must be a black powder gun patented before 1894. No gun that takes any kind of a shell or cartidge is allowed. This law applies to all 50 states. The U.S. Code Title 18 states that (I am paraphrasing) muzzle loading pistols and rifles are classified the same as black powder guns 'patented before 1894' though the law uses 'in or before 1898' as long as they are not modified to accept a fixed cartridge such as a bullet or shell and as long as they are not easily modified to accept the same such as the modern muzzle loading rifles that can have the barrel or breach exchanged with one that would fire a modern cartridge. There is a stipulation that they can fire fixed cartridges as long as they are no longer available in the U.S. through normal 'channels' (e.g. obsolete sized cartridges, or foreign calibers)