Here's a side by side comparison that proves it cannot.
Design year19471957Weight (with loaded 30 round magazine)4.78 kg (10.5 lb)[3][4]3.6 kg (7.9 lb)[5]Overall length87.0 cm (34.3 in)99.0 cm (39.0 in)Barrel length40.6 cm (16.0 in)50.8 cm (20.0 in)Height (with magazine)26.7 cm (10.5 in)26.7 cm (10.5 in)Sight radius37.8 cm (14.9 in)50.0 cm (19.7 in)Cartridge(M43)7.62x39mm(M193)5.56x45mmBullet weight122 gr
(7.9 g)[6]55 gr
(3.6 g)[6]Velocity2,330 fps
(710 m/s)[6]3,250 fps
(990 m/s)[6]Energy1,469 ft·lbf
(1,991 J)[6]1,302 ft·lbf
(1,764 J)[6]Effective range400 m (440 yd)[7]500 yd (460 m)[8]Accuracy @ 100 yards3-5 in (7.6-13 cm)[9]4.3 in (11 cm)[10]Penetration (ballistic Gelatin)~26 in
(66 cm)[11]~15 in
(38 cm)[11]
Both are very powerful, But the AK47 is more. The m16 has better accuracy tho.
There is no one answer- it depends on the rifle. They are generally less powerful than a full size battle rifle cartridge. The M16 rifle uses a 5.56mm bullet, the AK47 a 7.62mm bullet, etc.
no
m4,m16,ak47
An AK47 or Kalashnikov ( excuse my spelling ) followed by the m16
Noop. an M16 fires a 5.56mm (or .223 caliber) bullet. A .45 caliber shoots a bullet that is ~11.43mm.
5.56
The M16 rifle uses the 5.56x45mm NATO cartridge. This lightweight round is designed for accuracy and high velocity, making it effective for military applications. The M16 can also chamber the .223 Remington, though the two cartridges are not identical.
You get the ak47 or m16 or glock and shoot the eagle in the groin
In terms of most magazines on popular models such as the m16, m4, ak47, etc... yes.
ak47 m16 m15 m14 mp5 mr40 rocket launchers
A lot of that depends on if you have proper ammunition for the target. But for close range, open areas, or inside buildings, it is pretty decent. Its best quality is the accuracy. It is less powerful than the AK47, but much more accurate. For urban fighting, an AK47 with its heavy punch and penetrating power is better, but an M16 is very flexible and does decent in many situations, including longer ranges where an AK47 would be horribly inaccurate