this is a very opinion based question. i will give you my opinion. i belive that the process we have now to legally carry a gun is just fine.
A gun or a knife never killed anyone without help.
But logically yes it should should be able to be carried otherwise how else would you be able to get it from point A to point B?
to scare people
No, machine guns were typically carried by a machine gun team. An officer seldom carried a machine gun and normally a pistol and perhaps a carbine. Some may have been able to get a sub-machine gun.
Your question assumes that people shouldn't be able to buy guns "in the market", whatever that means, which is far from proven.
Yes
If police carried guns then criminals would be more likely to have guns aswell to protect themselves from the police. Also very few people are able to live with the guilt of killing someone. so if a police person had to kill someone to save there own life they would find it very hard to deal with as they know they have ended someones life.
No. Machine guns will beat Gatling guns.
only people who are members of a militia should be able to own guns
People should be able to carry guns only if they have a license and for protection. Other wise their is really no point in carrying a gun. ***** Above is an opinion. I would ask why not? Are the majority of people honest and law abiding? Having a firearm does not change that.
The Spitfire did not carry bombs, only guns
Portable
You have to earn the golden guns
they had a militant image and carried guns?