An After Action Review (AAR) typically consists of four main parts: What was supposed to happen, which outlines the original objectives and plans; What actually happened, detailing the events that occurred; Why it happened, analyzing the reasons behind any discrepancies; and What can be improved, which focuses on lessons learned and recommendations for future actions. This structured approach encourages open communication and continuous improvement within teams or organizations.
One of the four parts of an after action review is to determine what went right or wrong.
One of the four parts of an after action review is to determine what went right or wrong.
One of the four parts of an after action review is to determine what went right or wrong.
One of the four parts of an after action review is to determine what went right or wrong.
One of the four parts of an after action review is to determine what went right or wrong.
One of the four parts of an after action review is to determine what went right or wrong.
Established what happened.
Determine how to do the task differently next time.
what are the four steps in the execution of an after action review
Establish what happened.Determine what was right or wrong with what happened.Determine how the task should be done differently the next time.Perform the task again.
Establish what happened.Determine what was right or wrong with what happened.Determine how the task should be done differently the next time.Perform the task again.
Establish what happened.Determine what was right or wrong with what happened.Determine how the task should be done differently the next time.Perform the task again.